Talk:Alternative fuel: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 90d) to Talk:Alternative fuel/Archive 1. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Bi liquid fuels == |
== Bi liquid fuels == |
||
Oil and water can mixed in a stable form, without a suffactant |
Oil and water can mixed in a stable form, without a suffactant type of ticco pitties |
||
There is the possibility to water down all oil based fuels by up to 20% |
There is the possibility to water down all oil based fuels by up to 20% |
Revision as of 16:35, 17 February 2011
Environment B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Energy C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alternative fuel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
Alternatives to oil
I'm afraid in merging with "Fuel" we have orphaned those uses of oil which do not include "fuel" Oil is a base for petrochemicals as well as plastics and pesticides (a non-fuel petrochemical). These are quite important uses of oil, and I suggest we find a way to embrace them. Perhaps we merge the other way - and make Energy one of several uses for oil which require alternatives? Benjamin Gatti
Bi liquid fuels
Oil and water can mixed in a stable form, without a suffactant type of ticco pitties
There is the possibility to water down all oil based fuels by up to 20%
Providing the mix contains some ethanol the fuel retains its power
This can be possible and the mixture will remain a stable dispersion providing the fluids are put through the correct process
Philip McDowell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.121.253 (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Fossil fuel
Fossil fuel are not really alternative fuels, because they go the same problem than petroleum: they are not renewable and produce fossil fuels. --Mac (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the section on non-conventional oil, beefed up the CNG info, and renamed what's left as "Alternative fossil fuels". NJGW (talk) 12:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Comparisation of alternative fuels
Can a table be made comparing the alternative fuels based on co2 emissions, cost, ... Also include hydrogen peroxide —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.245.188.240 (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I think, undergo a chemical change should be a temperature change, Mion (talk) 00:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC) see : Thermal hydrogen compressor . Mion (talk) 00:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Renaming of article
The article can perhaps be renamed to "Combustible energetic fluid"/Combustible energy substances. This as the main focus is on ("alternative") combustible energy carriers, eg those that can be burned in a conventional internal combustion engine (so that engines may be modified rather than swapped).Also, the substances must be storable (holding its energy over some degree of time)
Renewable power (electricity) is not storable (unless in a battery, but then the energy source is the battery; not the power) and should be removed.
Biomass (pure wood) can also be used as a "fuel" (see http://www.biomassauthority.com/a/precer-bioracer-biomass-car/) Not sure where to mention it however, perhaps on other article as it probably cant be burned in a ICE engine. Biochar too can probably be mentioned.
Articles for deletion nomination of ICE fuel conversion
I have nominated ICE fuel conversion for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICE fuel conversion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
I thought folks here might be interested in this. Mion (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Alternative ICE fuel generator
I have nominated ICE fuel conversion for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative ICE fuel generator. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
I thought folks here might be interested in this. Mion (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)