Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mitzewich: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m →John Mitzewich: typo |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|John Mitzewich}}) |
:({{Find sources|John Mitzewich}}) |
||
Nothing establishes real [[WP:GNG|notability]]. Written in a promotional tone, with no reliable, secondary sources. (Author contested prod). [[User:OSborn|OSborn]]<sup> [[User_talk:OSborn|arf]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/OSborn|contribs.]]</sub> 14:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
Nothing establishes real [[WP:GNG|notability]]. Written in a promotional tone, with no reliable, secondary sources. (Author contested prod). [[User:OSborn|OSborn]]<sup> [[User_talk:OSborn|arf]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/OSborn|contribs.]]</sub> 14:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' [[Chicago Tribune]], August 6, 2008: "One of the most popular video cooks however is John |
*'''Keep''' [[Chicago Tribune]], August 6, 2008: "One of the most popular video cooks however is John Mitzewich of YouTube fame." The [[San Jose Mercury News]] published an in-depth profile of him on February 9, 2011. He's notable, and shortcomings in the article can be addressed through normal editing rather than deletion. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 16:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink|list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink|list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
Revision as of 21:04, 20 February 2011
- John Mitzewich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing establishes real notability. Written in a promotional tone, with no reliable, secondary sources. (Author contested prod). OSborn arfcontribs. 14:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Chicago Tribune, August 6, 2008: "One of the most popular video cooks however is John Mitzewich of YouTube fame." The San Jose Mercury News published an in-depth profile of him on February 9, 2011. He's notable, and shortcomings in the article can be addressed through normal editing rather than deletion. Cullen328 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
There are additional articles to substantiate if needed. For instance this Bay Area Living Article is from a small time news establishment but it does establish the fact that he is "big time." Someone with more knowledge of him should be able to fill in the obvious gaps. Enburst (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)