User talk:Cpl Syx: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by Ijustcrimpedoneoff (talk) to last revision by Cpl Syx (HG) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
== Previous edit/unconstructive. == |
|||
I WANT YOUR NIPPLE IN MY MOUTH |
|||
Sorry about that previous edit that has already been reverted. Was not constructive in the least, however it was a tad entertaining. Thanks for putting it back and not taking it completely serious. |
|||
- Some random Wiki user. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.221.72.252|71.221.72.252]] ([[User talk:71.221.72.252|talk]]) 20:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Hey! == |
== Hey! == |
||
Revision as of 00:21, 4 March 2011
 | Thank you in advance to those who revert vandalism in my userspace. It is very much appreciated. |
 |
|
Talkback
Please leave your talkback boxes here.
Previous edit/unconstructive.
Sorry about that previous edit that has already been reverted. Was not constructive in the least, however it was a tad entertaining. Thanks for putting it back and not taking it completely serious.
- Some random Wiki user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.72.252 (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey!
Stop reverting at such a quick rate! There are other vandal-fighters trying to get their share of edits. I am a violinist ♫ talk to me here! 13:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- That has to be one of the best comments left for me in quite some time! Keep up the good work, and hopefully we can stem the ever-flowing tide of vandalism :D Cpl Syx [talk] 13:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment from 70.162.90.165
thats what i got from the game —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.90.165 (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
i do declare sir that you have not read the wikipedia rules and they state that you may edit what you belive are facts in the article and thats what i did —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.90.165 (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
User:Access Denied is Back
Is almost definitely a sock of Access Denied (talk · contribs), a notorious puppetmaster. Watch him get blocked very, very shortly... GiantSnowman 02:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- And I would expect nothing less! ;) Cpl Syx [talk] 02:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
RE: Occupiers Liability Act 1957
The amendment i made in this page at the end of the section headed 'Independent contractors' to the word 'ensured' was a legitimate correction. You might like to learn some law and common sense to note that "there was no "free-standing duty" to take reasonable steps to ensure an independent contractor was Insured(not Ensured)" before undoing my change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.253.101 (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are absolutely correct; I incorrectly read the paragraph upon verifying it. My apologies - however I do not appreciate your tone as we are all invited to be bold. Cpl Syx [talk] 00:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)