Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Paralympiakos

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 18:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 08:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC).

---

• Paralympiakos (talk · contribs · logs)

---

Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page.

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Paralympiakos reverts any change that he doesn't like despite they being done by consensus and following the related guidelines.

Desired outcome

This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.

Paralympiakos will agree to stop disruptive editing (reverting any changes done to MMA articles in accordance to the MOS and consensus.)

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

The guidelines at the WP:MMA were rewritten to be in accordance with WP:MOS and related Manual of Styles and there is a consensus for that as can be seen in WT:MMA#MMA record table problems. Since then Paralympiakos has decided to ignore the related MOS because he doesn't like them and he reverts any edits done in MMA biographical articles that follow the MOS without giving a real rationale to ignore the consensus other than, "it looks ugly". Within the original discussion at WT:MMA#MMA record table problems, he simply stated that he didn't care about the MOS guidelines, never giving a valid reason to ignore them and also ignoring the consensus in the discussion. After that, he decided he simply reverts any change done to any biographical article that he doesn't like and giving several times a mocking summary edit. Also, instead of discussing why the MOS should be ignored at WT:MMA, he tries to discourage users by contacting them directly in their talk pages.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

1. [1] Reverts WP:MMA
2. [2] Reverts WP:MMA
3. [3] Reverts WP:MMA
4. [4] Reverts Alistair Overeem
5. [5] Reverts Alistair Overeem calling it stupid.
6. [6] Reverts Diego Sanchez
7. [7] Reverts Diego Sanchez
8. [8] Reverts Thiago Silva (fighter) to his version which calls "the good version".
9. [9] Reverts Thiago Silva (fighter) to what he calls "normal convention".
10. [10] Reverts Junior dos Santos
11. [11] Reverts Junior dos Santos
12. [12] Reverts Gegard Mousasi
13. [13] Reverts Stefan Struve
14. [14] Reverts Lyoto Machida
15. [15] Reverts Jon Jones (fighter)
16. [16] Reverts Andrei Arlovski

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:DE
2. WP:IDHT
3. WP:PA
4. WP:CON
5. WP:OWN
6. WP:CIVIL
7. WP:EW

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute

(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

• [17] The appropiated guidelines and reasoning are shown to him
• [18] It is pointed out to him that his conduct is borderline rude and inmature
• [19] It is pointed out that his way of arguing does not benefit the discussion
• [20] It is shown to him that he is the only one that is against following the MOS.

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute

(Provide diffs to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

1. [21] He states that he doesn't care about polices.
2. [22] Claims that only two editors are in favor of following the MOS and claims that others are the cause of the problem, not him.
3. [23] Despite evidence to the contrary he states that there is no consensus.
4. [24] Claims that guidelines are to be followed only if we wish to and claims that a majority doesn't want to follow them.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. Jfgslo (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
2. Tuoppi gm (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside views

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

Outside view by ExampleUsername

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by ExampleUsername

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.