User:KMalaysia/RFA: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m tweak |
m tweak |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor in a variety of areas in which having the |
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor (for those who like stats: 47,500 edits over 12 months) in a variety of areas in which having the tools would benefit the project. I highlight the following reasons why Fæ should be given the tools: |
||
*Fæ is an OTRS volunteer. |
*Fæ is an OTRS volunteer and has been for [X] months. The fact of being an OTRS volunteer already demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. But also, having the administrative tools will help Fæ to carry out important OTRS-related functions, like dealing with copyright and BLP violations that get reported via email. |
||
*Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article. |
*Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article. |
||
*Fæ's one featured article, [[Hoxne Hoard]], demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hoxne Hoard/archive1|passed FA]] as the result of an [[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Hoxne challenge|organised collaboration]] between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line. |
*Fæ's one featured article, [[Hoxne Hoard]], demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hoxne Hoard/archive1|passed FA]] as the result of an [[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Hoxne challenge|organised collaboration]] between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line. |
Revision as of 20:57, 5 March 2011
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor (for those who like stats: 47,500 edits over 12 months) in a variety of areas in which having the tools would benefit the project. I highlight the following reasons why Fæ should be given the tools:
- Fæ is an OTRS volunteer and has been for [X] months. The fact of being an OTRS volunteer already demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. But also, having the administrative tools will help Fæ to carry out important OTRS-related functions, like dealing with copyright and BLP violations that get reported via email.
- Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article.
- Fæ's one featured article, Hoxne Hoard, demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article passed FA as the result of an organised collaboration between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line.
- Fæ is very competent in deletion policy and practice, in both speedy deletions and at AfD. Fæ has performed good non-admin closes (eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macedonian language) and makes well-reasoned nominations (eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis Xavier Montmorency and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irena Lipienė).
- Fæ is a proficient vandal fighter.
- Fæ deals with complaints well - one of the most important parts of being an admin. A review of Fæ's talk page articles reveals that editors do disagree with Fæ from time to time: but the disagreements and complaints are dealt with courteously and constructively.