Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Huldra/Sandbox2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
attack page per [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]] is not allowed [[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 19:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
attack page per [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]] is not allowed [[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 19:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' This page has some "evidences" against me that are from April of last year, other evidences are simply false.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 19:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' This page has some "evidences" against me that are from April of last year, other evidences are simply false.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 19:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Please specify which evidence is false? |
|||
*'''Delete'''-- per [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]]. This page has no positive purpose on the wiki. --<span style="border: 1px solid gold;padding:1px; background-color:navy;">[[User:e2eamon|<font color="gold">E♴</font>]] [[User talk:e2eamon|<font color="gold">(talk)</font>]]</span> 23:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''-- per [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]]. This page has no positive purpose on the wiki. --<span style="border: 1px solid gold;padding:1px; background-color:navy;">[[User:e2eamon|<font color="gold">E♴</font>]] [[User talk:e2eamon|<font color="gold">(talk)</font>]]</span> 23:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - Seems like a rather spiteful nomination, given the interactive history here. Subject has stated [[User_talk:Huldra#Your_spurious_claim_on_AN.2FI|here]] that she is using the page to collect notes with the intent to file a ban request on MBZ. This is an allowable and acceptable use of userspace if it isn't directly [[WP:NPA]]-violating. The sandbox is largely a list of links to contentious AfDs and voting patterns, and direct quotes of other editors. Perhaps Huldra could tone down some of the header titles such as "DRAMAH" and "using wikipedia to make a group of people look bad", and get on the ball with an actual complaint filing if that is the intent...this stuff shouldn't languish forever...but other than that this MfD is itself has more drama-inducing potential than what is on the sandbox. At most, if this user really doesn't have time, a courtesy blanking could be done. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 17:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - Seems like a rather spiteful nomination, given the interactive history here. Subject has stated [[User_talk:Huldra#Your_spurious_claim_on_AN.2FI|here]] that she is using the page to collect notes with the intent to file a ban request on MBZ. This is an allowable and acceptable use of userspace if it isn't directly [[WP:NPA]]-violating. The sandbox is largely a list of links to contentious AfDs and voting patterns, and direct quotes of other editors. Perhaps Huldra could tone down some of the header titles such as "DRAMAH" and "using wikipedia to make a group of people look bad", and get on the ball with an actual complaint filing if that is the intent...this stuff shouldn't languish forever...but other than that this MfD is itself has more drama-inducing potential than what is on the sandbox. At most, if this user really doesn't have time, a courtesy blanking could be done. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 17:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:16, 8 March 2011
attack page per WP:UP#POLEMIC is not allowed Mbz1 (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment This page has some "evidences" against me that are from April of last year, other evidences are simply false.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Please specify which evidence is false?
- Delete-- per WP:UP#POLEMIC. This page has no positive purpose on the wiki. --E♴ (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Seems like a rather spiteful nomination, given the interactive history here. Subject has stated here that she is using the page to collect notes with the intent to file a ban request on MBZ. This is an allowable and acceptable use of userspace if it isn't directly WP:NPA-violating. The sandbox is largely a list of links to contentious AfDs and voting patterns, and direct quotes of other editors. Perhaps Huldra could tone down some of the header titles such as "DRAMAH" and "using wikipedia to make a group of people look bad", and get on the ball with an actual complaint filing if that is the intent...this stuff shouldn't languish forever...but other than that this MfD is itself has more drama-inducing potential than what is on the sandbox. At most, if this user really doesn't have time, a courtesy blanking could be done. Tarc (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete According to WP:UP#POLEMIC "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner." (highlighted by me) should not be at the user pages. That page was created on February 26. "Timely matter" to use it has passed, and in accordance with the wikipedia policy that page should be deleted. It actually should not have been even nominated on deletion. It should have been speedy deleted in accordance with a policy, not to say that the page is used for campaigning [1] --Mbz1 (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin - The "strong delete" above is also the nominator. be sure not to double-count in the final tally. Tarc (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin Before taking tarc's vote into account please take a look at its uncivil comment about me: "that insufferable twat Mbz1".More examples of its hounding my contributions and me could be presented by request. --Mbz1 (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)