Jump to content

Talk:Complete market: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Apedraza1982 - "merge: "
Line 6: Line 6:
:*'''Support merge''' either way - no need for 2 articles. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 11:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
:*'''Support merge''' either way - no need for 2 articles. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 11:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


:*'''Do not merge''' The study of incomplete markets arises from the failure of Complete Markets. It is not that one thing is embeded in the other. Complete Markets is in itself the basic framework for the theory of [[Arrow-Debreu]] Equilibrium, a milestone in modern economics. On the other hand, Incomplete markets provides a framework to study economic activity where the assumptions of Complete Markets no longer hold. It is set up to undestand, not only why market are incomplete, but its consequences in the economic and financial activity of individuals and institutions. I think, for ease of presentation and to make a clear distinction between the two, it would be better to leave separate artciles on 'Complete' and 'Incomplete' markets.
:*'''Do not merge''' The study of incomplete markets arises from the failure of Complete Markets. It is not that one thing is embeded in the other. Complete Markets is in itself the basic framework for the theory of [[Arrow-Debreu]] Equilibrium, a milestone in modern economics. On the other hand, Incomplete markets provides a framework to study economic activity where the assumptions of Complete Markets no longer hold. It is set up to undestand, not only why market are incomplete, but its consequences in the economic and financial activity of individuals and institutions. I think, for ease of presentation and to make a clear distinction between the two, it would be better to leave separate artciles on 'Complete' and 'Incomplete' markets. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Apedraza1982|Apedraza1982]] ([[User talk:Apedraza1982|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Apedraza1982|contribs]]) 20:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==self-financing==
==self-financing==

Revision as of 20:39, 8 March 2011

WikiProject iconEconomics Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

merge

I think that if anything 'complete market' should be merged into this one. There are textbooks out there entitled "Incomplete markets" and the subject matter is generally known as "Incomplete markets theory".radek 19:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do not merge The study of incomplete markets arises from the failure of Complete Markets. It is not that one thing is embeded in the other. Complete Markets is in itself the basic framework for the theory of Arrow-Debreu Equilibrium, a milestone in modern economics. On the other hand, Incomplete markets provides a framework to study economic activity where the assumptions of Complete Markets no longer hold. It is set up to undestand, not only why market are incomplete, but its consequences in the economic and financial activity of individuals and institutions. I think, for ease of presentation and to make a clear distinction between the two, it would be better to leave separate artciles on 'Complete' and 'Incomplete' markets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apedraza1982 (talkcontribs) 20:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

self-financing

Definition of a self-financing trading strategy (intuitive): A portfolio is self-financing if there is no exogenous infusion or withdrawal of money. “The purchase of a new asset must be financed by the sale of an old one.” Cutnyakdhien 20:36, 2 February 2008

trading strategy, contingent claim

Can we please define them? I linked them to WP articles, but to me it seems that the original editor had different concetps in mind. 58.88.53.246 (talk) 10:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]