ASRAAM: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Unlike SRAAM, outright maneuverability was no longer the main concern. The new AIM-120 had a fairly long range and could be expect to be fired against targets around 20 miles away, while SRAAM and Sidewinder were much shorter-range weapons with useful ranges of only a few miles. There was a fairly large range gap between the two designs that the UK-German team felt was the most important problem to solve. Although portions of the original SRAAM design were used, the airframe was extensively redesigned to produce a missile with less maneuverability, but greater speed and range, closing the distance gap as well as making it difficult to avoid simply because it was so fast. The new ASRAAM did not use the thrust vectoring system of SRAAM but used conventional aerodynamic surfaces, in the form of four small delta-wings at the extreme rear of the missile. |
Unlike SRAAM, outright maneuverability was no longer the main concern. The new AIM-120 had a fairly long range and could be expect to be fired against targets around 20 miles away, while SRAAM and Sidewinder were much shorter-range weapons with useful ranges of only a few miles. There was a fairly large range gap between the two designs that the UK-German team felt was the most important problem to solve. Although portions of the original SRAAM design were used, the airframe was extensively redesigned to produce a missile with less maneuverability, but greater speed and range, closing the distance gap as well as making it difficult to avoid simply because it was so fast. The new ASRAAM did not use the thrust vectoring system of SRAAM but used conventional aerodynamic surfaces, in the form of four small delta-wings at the extreme rear of the missile. |
||
While ASRAAM was being developed, re-unification of Germany gave the [[Luftwaffe]] their first look at the Russian [[Vympel R-73]] missile, known in the west as the AA-11 ''Archer''. This proved to be a far more advanced short range attack weapon than either Sidewinder or the ASRAAM, being the first air launched missile capable of true "dogfighting" capability, meaning that it was able to be used as a legitimate alternative to typical in-close gun/cannon fire. It was clearly able to outperform |
While ASRAAM was being developed, re-unification of Germany gave the [[Luftwaffe]] their first look at the Russian [[Vympel R-73]] missile, known in the west as the AA-11 ''Archer''. This proved to be a far more advanced short range attack weapon than either Sidewinder or the ASRAAM, being the first air launched missile capable of true "dogfighting" capability, meaning that it was able to be used as a legitimate alternative to typical in-close gun/cannon fire. It was clearly able to outperform all operational Western short range IF tracking missiles - particularly in the ability to guide in high off-axis attacks, but also in terms of field of view, acquisition range, maneuverability, ease of target designation, and target lock-on. Concluding that they needed a missile with better performance than the ''Archer'', the UK-German partnership broke down in the early 1990s, with the Luftwaffe deciding in 1995 to produce a new, greatly improved air-to-air missile, the [[IRIS-T]] built by [[Diehl BGT Defence]]. Due to the numerous developmental delays caused by the UK-German bickering over ASRAAM design with no solution in sight, and in light of threat of ''Archer'', the US could not wait any longer and began development of their own improved version of the Sidewinder, the [[AIM-9X_Sidewinder#AIM-9X|AIM-9X]] in 1990. |
||
With the German exit from the ASRAAM project, the UK sought a new source for the ASRAAM seeker and selected a Hughes [[focal plane array]] imaging infrared seeker. Somewhat ironically, Hughes used the same technology in their winning submission for AIM-9X, so the ASRAAM and the AIM-9X both use the same Hughes-developed seeker. Raytheon also proposed a seeker for ASRAAM and submitted an AIM-9X proposal, but was not selected. However, Raytheon ultimately purchased Hughes and is now the producer of seekers for both ASRAAM and AIM-9X. |
With the German exit from the ASRAAM project, the UK sought a new source for the ASRAAM seeker and selected a Hughes [[focal plane array]] imaging infrared seeker. Somewhat ironically, Hughes used the same technology in their winning submission for AIM-9X, so the ASRAAM and the AIM-9X both use the same Hughes-developed seeker. Raytheon also proposed a seeker for ASRAAM and submitted an AIM-9X proposal, but was not selected. However, Raytheon ultimately purchased Hughes and is now the producer of seekers for both ASRAAM and AIM-9X. |
||
Revision as of 16:00, 20 March 2011
| AIM-132 ASRAAM | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | Short-range air-to-air missile |
| Place of origin |  United Kingdom |
| Service history | |
| In service | 2002 |
| Used by | See Operators |
| Production history | |
| Manufacturer | MBDA |
| Unit cost | > £200,000 |
| Specifications | |
| Mass | 88 kg |
| Length | 2.90 m |
| Diameter | 166 mm |
| Wingspan | 450 mm |
| Warhead | 10 kg blast/fragmentation |
Detonation mechanism | laser proximity fuze and impact |
| Engine | solid rocket motor |
Operational range | 300 m – 18 km |
| Flight altitude | N/A |
| Maximum speed | Mach 3+[1] |
Guidance system | Imaging infra-red, 128×128 element focal plane array, with lock-on after launch (LOAL) and strapdown inertial[1] |
Launch platform | Aircraft: |
The AIM-132 Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile is an infrared homing ("heat seeking") air-to-air missile, produced by MBDA. It is currently in service in the Royal Air Force and Royal Australian Air Force, replacing the AIM-9 Sidewinder in those services. The project started as a British-German collaboration in the 1980s; eventually the Germans left the project due to concerns over the missile's performance. The British went ahead on their own, and the missile was introduced into RAF service in 1998. ASRAAM was developed to have longer range and higher speed than the Sidewinder at the expense of some manoeuverability.
History
In the 1980s, NATO countries signed a Memorandum of Agreement that the United States would develop a medium-range air-to-air missile to replace the AIM-7 Sparrow, while Britain and Germany would develop a short-range air-to-air missile to replace the AIM-9 Sidewinder. The US design developed as the AIM-120 AMRAAM, while the UK-German design started as the AIM-132 ASRAAM.
The starting point for the UK portion of the ASRAAM design was an experimental short-range missile designed by Hawker Siddeley in the 1970s, SRAAM/Taildog. The SRAAM contract was cancelled in 1974, but retained as a technology demonstration program. The German contribution to ASRAAM was a new advanced seeker.
Unlike SRAAM, outright maneuverability was no longer the main concern. The new AIM-120 had a fairly long range and could be expect to be fired against targets around 20 miles away, while SRAAM and Sidewinder were much shorter-range weapons with useful ranges of only a few miles. There was a fairly large range gap between the two designs that the UK-German team felt was the most important problem to solve. Although portions of the original SRAAM design were used, the airframe was extensively redesigned to produce a missile with less maneuverability, but greater speed and range, closing the distance gap as well as making it difficult to avoid simply because it was so fast. The new ASRAAM did not use the thrust vectoring system of SRAAM but used conventional aerodynamic surfaces, in the form of four small delta-wings at the extreme rear of the missile.
While ASRAAM was being developed, re-unification of Germany gave the Luftwaffe their first look at the Russian Vympel R-73 missile, known in the west as the AA-11 Archer. This proved to be a far more advanced short range attack weapon than either Sidewinder or the ASRAAM, being the first air launched missile capable of true "dogfighting" capability, meaning that it was able to be used as a legitimate alternative to typical in-close gun/cannon fire. It was clearly able to outperform all operational Western short range IF tracking missiles - particularly in the ability to guide in high off-axis attacks, but also in terms of field of view, acquisition range, maneuverability, ease of target designation, and target lock-on. Concluding that they needed a missile with better performance than the Archer, the UK-German partnership broke down in the early 1990s, with the Luftwaffe deciding in 1995 to produce a new, greatly improved air-to-air missile, the IRIS-T built by Diehl BGT Defence. Due to the numerous developmental delays caused by the UK-German bickering over ASRAAM design with no solution in sight, and in light of threat of Archer, the US could not wait any longer and began development of their own improved version of the Sidewinder, the AIM-9X in 1990.
With the German exit from the ASRAAM project, the UK sought a new source for the ASRAAM seeker and selected a Hughes focal plane array imaging infrared seeker. Somewhat ironically, Hughes used the same technology in their winning submission for AIM-9X, so the ASRAAM and the AIM-9X both use the same Hughes-developed seeker. Raytheon also proposed a seeker for ASRAAM and submitted an AIM-9X proposal, but was not selected. However, Raytheon ultimately purchased Hughes and is now the producer of seekers for both ASRAAM and AIM-9X.
In January 1995 British Aerospace Dynamics, who had purchased Hawker Siddeley, arranged for financing from the British Government to enter the ASRAAM in the AIM-9X contest. The testing concluded in June 1996, with the result that the ASRAAM did not meet the AIM-9X in terms of off-axis capabilities, and the project was dropped from US contention.
UK development and manufacture went ahead regardless, and the first ASRAAM was delivered to the RAF in late 1998. It equips the RAF's Tornado F3 and Harrier GR7, and will become the primary short-range weapon for the RAF's Eurofighter Typhoons. In February 1998 the British-French Matra British Aerospace consortium won a contract to supply the ASRAAM to the Royal Australian Air Force for use on their F/A-18 Hornets where the improved ASRAAM, the Rafael Python 4 and the AIM-9X were competitively evaluated, with the ASRAAM selected over the other two contenders. [2]
In March 2009 the Royal Australian Air Force successfully carried out the first in-service 'Lock After Launch' firing of an ASRAAM at a target located behind the wing-line of the ‘shooter’ aircraft.[3]
Description
Characteristics
The main improvement, which was also made on the latest version of the AIM-9 Sidewinder, is a new focal plane array FPA (128x128 resolution imaging infrared) seeker developed by Hughes before they were acquired by Raytheon. This seeker has a long acquisition range, high countermeasures resistance, approximately 90 degrees off-boresight lock-on capability, and the possibility to designate specific parts of the targeted aircraft (like cockpit, engines, etc.). The ASRAAM also has a LOAL (Lock-On After Launch) ability which is a distinct advantage when the missile is carried in an internal bay such as in the upcoming F-35 Lightning II.
ASRAAM P3I
In 1995, Hughes and British Aerospace collaborated on the "P3I ASRAAM" - a version of ASRAAM as a candidate for the AIM-9X program. The P3I would have been very much like the AIM-132, but with the addition of thrust vectoring to provide increased agility and to carry a larger warhead to meet the requirements expressed by the US Navy led AIM-9X program. The ultimate winner was the Hughes submission using the same seeker but using the rocket motor, fuze and warhead of the AIM-9M. The latter was a US Air Force stipulation to ease the logistics burden and save by reusing as much as possible of the existing AIM-9 Sidewinder — of which 20,000 remained in the US inventory.
Potential future development
At the DSEi conference in September 2007 it was announced the UK MoD was funding a study by MBDA to investigate a replacement for the Rapier and Sea Wolf missiles. The Common Anti-Air Modular Missile (CAMM), would share components with ASRAAM.[4]
MBDA has agreed to jointly develop a new generation air-to-air missile with India.[5]
Operators
- United Kingdom
- Royal Air Force
United Arab Emirates- United Arab Emirates Air Force
Australia- Royal Australian Air Force
India- Indian Air Force : Plans for upgrading 52 Dassault Mirage 2000 and 100 Jaguar aircraft to carry the missile, beginning in 2007[6].
See also
References
- Notes
- ^ a b http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-132.htm
- ^ http://www.ausairpower.net/API-ASRAAM-Analysis.html
- ^ Industry News, Your (2009-03-09). "RAAF has successfully fired ASRAAM at a target located behind the wing-line of the 'shooter' aircraft". Your Industry News. Retrieved 2009-03-10.
- ^ Missiles and Fire Support at DSEi 2007
- ^ http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairw/articles/20100218.aspx
- ^ "Missile Mirage", Aviation Week & Space Technology, 1 January 2007.
- Bibliography