Jump to content

Talk:Funerary urn from Biała: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Dating comment by 99.54.188.157 - ""
assess
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPRUSSIA|class=stub|importance=low|relig=yes|hist=yes|art=yes}}

We know that this symbol represents the hands of god for Slavic pagans today, but do we actually know that this symbol represented the same thing to ancient Vandals? [[Special:Contributions/193.65.112.51|193.65.112.51]] ([[User talk:193.65.112.51|talk]]) 16:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
We know that this symbol represents the hands of god for Slavic pagans today, but do we actually know that this symbol represented the same thing to ancient Vandals? [[Special:Contributions/193.65.112.51|193.65.112.51]] ([[User talk:193.65.112.51|talk]]) 16:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)



Revision as of 12:59, 23 March 2011

WikiProject iconRussia: Visual arts / History / Religion Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

We know that this symbol represents the hands of god for Slavic pagans today, but do we actually know that this symbol represented the same thing to ancient Vandals? 193.65.112.51 (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence is there that this was a symbol of the ancient Vandals at all? AnonMoos (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not only that, but also wouldn't it have a polytheistic meaning not monotheistic?99.54.188.157 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]