Talk:Sodium Reactor Experiment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:10, 23 March 2011

Physics C‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy C‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV Check tag

This important and recent source, http://www.miller-mccune.com/science_environment/50-years-after-nuclear-meltdown-1438 has been removed from the article, see [1], and generally the article downplays the whole accident. Johnfos (talk) 22:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In particular, I find the 'comparison to other nuclear accidents' section problematic. The IAEA has not issued a INES value for the SRE partial meltdown, and it is inappropriate for a speculative value of 3 to be listed, especially as it seems downplay the severity. The advisory panel of scientists created in 2001 spent 5 years researching the incident and concluded that it likely released 459 times as many curies of radiation as the Three Mile Island disaster and resulted in 260 cases of cancer in the surrounding population, see http://www.ssflpanel.org/.

I am removing the invented value of a Level 3 INES classification.--IBrow1000 (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article reads like a power company press release on valium. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.52.75 (talk) 19:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More sources tag

Many more references are needed in this article. Six paragraphs have no citations and many other points are unreferenced. The lead needs references too, see WP:LEAD#citations. Also, there is too much reliance on the Jarett interim report. A wider range of sources would be good. Johnfos (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 I am removing the invented value of a Level 3 INES classification.--[[User:IBrow1000|IBrow1000]] ([[User talk:IBrow1000|talk]]) 00:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
+Article reads like a power company press release on valium.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.27.52.75|88.27.52.75]] ([[User talk:88.27.52.75|talk]]) 19:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Article reads like a power company press release on valium.
 ==More sources tag==