Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canvas Networks: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:16, 29 March 2011

Canvas Networks

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability claims hang off persons associated with project. References do not prop up independent notability of this topic. Hasteur (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Premptiveley tagging with Not A Vote based on people associated with the subject Hasteur (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep There are at least a dozen strong, exclusive sources if you look on Google News -- for example, I just added one story from the print edition of The New York Times, and would be happy to add others from Wired, PC World and others when I have a little more time. Notability is clearly not just inherited here: it comes from the reliable coverage of the site itself and its founding. Steven Walling 22:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:15, 29 March 2011 edit Steven Walling (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 49,751 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:16, 29 March 2011 edit undo Steven Walling (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 49,751 edits dab Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites\|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 19:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites\|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 19:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)</small>

	* '''Strong Keep''' There are at least a dozen strong, exclusive sources if you look on Google News -- for example, I just added one story from the print edition of ''The New York Times'', and would be happy to add others from [[Wired (magazine)\|Wired]], [[~~PCWorld~~]] and others when I have a little more time. Notability is clearly not just inherited here: it comes from the reliable coverage of the site itself and its founding. <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling\|Steven Walling]]</font> 22:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)		* '''Strong Keep''' There are at least a dozen strong, exclusive sources if you look on Google News -- for example, I just added one story from the print edition of ''The New York Times'', and would be happy to add others from [[Wired (magazine)\|Wired]], [[PC World (magazine)\|PC World]] and others when I have a little more time. Notability is clearly not just inherited here: it comes from the reliable coverage of the site itself and its founding. <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling\|Steven Walling]]</font> 22:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)