User talk:189.79.206.127: Difference between revisions
Caution: Vandalism on Chess piece relative value. (TW) |
Gabriel dCF (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Chess piece relative value]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] <sup>[[User talk:Bubba73|You talkin' to me?]]</sup> 03:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Chess piece relative value]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] <sup>[[User talk:Bubba73|You talkin' to me?]]</sup> 03:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' |
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' |
||
Hello there, I am the user with IP 189.79.206.127 and I did the change that was erroneously identified as vandalism. The original text said that a good bishop values 10% of a bad bishop, what is ridiculous. The original text implied that you would need 10 good bishops to match a bad one. The author wanted to say that a good bishop is worthy 10 percent '''more''' than a bad bishop, which is pretty much the same thing of saying it values 110% more than a bad one. That's the change I made. You'ne mistaking your ignorance of simple math for vandalism. |
|||
Revision as of 03:21, 3 April 2011
April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chess piece relative value. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Hello there, I am the user with IP 189.79.206.127 and I did the change that was erroneously identified as vandalism. The original text said that a good bishop values 10% of a bad bishop, what is ridiculous. The original text implied that you would need 10 good bishops to match a bad one. The author wanted to say that a good bishop is worthy 10 percent more than a bad bishop, which is pretty much the same thing of saying it values 110% more than a bad one. That's the change I made. You'ne mistaking your ignorance of simple math for vandalism.