Talk:Three-phase commit protocol: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The protocol presented on the page at present conforms to the Skeen article which actually differs slightly from the description given at |
The protocol presented on the page at present conforms to the Skeen article which actually differs slightly from the description given at |
||
[http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs5204/fall00/distributedDBMS/sreenu/3pc.html]. Specifically, the state transition on the cohort from prepared to committed only happens when receiving a commit message from the coordinator in the original article. Was there a change to the protocol in the meantime? |
[http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs5204/fall00/distributedDBMS/sreenu/3pc.html]. Specifically, the state transition on the cohort from prepared to committed only happens when receiving a commit message from the coordinator in the original article. Was there a change to the protocol in the meantime? |
||
---- |
|||
i reformatted the protocol description at the bottom of the page to look similiar to [[two-phase_commit]]. hope nobody minds. [[User:Gba|gba]] 18:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:56, 4 March 2006
The protocol presented on the page at present conforms to the Skeen article which actually differs slightly from the description given at [1]. Specifically, the state transition on the cohort from prepared to committed only happens when receiving a commit message from the coordinator in the original article. Was there a change to the protocol in the meantime?
i reformatted the protocol description at the bottom of the page to look similiar to two-phase_commit. hope nobody minds. gba 18:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)