Talk:Star Trek: Phase II: Difference between revisions
rated WikiProject Star Trek and WikiProject Television |
m Converting {{Startrekproject}} to {{WikiProject Star Trek|class = |importance = }} using AWB |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Star Trek|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{TelevisionWikiProject|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
{{TelevisionWikiProject|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
||
Revision as of 16:26, 5 April 2011
 | Star Trek Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Television Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Star Trek 2.0
What about this "Star Trek 2.0 on G4TV?ChuckDizzle 02:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Star Trek 2.0 is just syndication of The Original Series with a chat room, a stock market, "Trek Stats", and trivia shown on screen while watching. You can join the chat and the Spock Market by signing up on the G4 website, but as I said, it's just The Original Series with that stuff added in. Jondy 00:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Star Trek II
Should we note somewhere that this series was going to be called "Star Trek II" (despite the confusion it would bring with the movie of the same name years later)? I believe "Phase II" was the fan-selected title to help distinguish the aborted TV series from "The Wrath of Khan." 207.238.52.162 (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Scripts?
Where does the talk about scripts in this article come from? I thought the book only included two. 24.158.134.254 13:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I found it! http://www.robsacc.nl/ottens/forgottentrek_phase2.html That website and the book is pretty much the main source of info in this article. 24.158.134.254 13:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Memory Alpha
Ah, it appears someone just pasted in the Memory Alpha version here. You can't do that. Memory Alpha is under a totally different licence (CC-SA-NC). Wikipedia is under GFDL. Morwen - Talk 11:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've now reverted this copyvio again for the second time, and have semiprotected. Morwen - Talk 21:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- And I've reverted it a further time. This is really utterly unacceptable, and users who revert back to a copyvio version despite warnings will be blocked.
- In case there is any doubt that this version was taken from memory alpha :
- an edit, 23 July 2006 made to the memory-alpha version which formatted their version so that each of the episodes had a separate paragraph.
- an edit, 29 November 2006, which made the Wikipedia version be a copy of that memory-alpha version. this is copied and pasted from memory-alpha, no doubt about it.
Now, memory-alpha is under a different licence to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is GFDL, memory alpha is under CC-BY-NC, which prohibits commercial use. We cannot take things written on memory-alpha and add them to Wikipedia, much as we might want to, without violating the law. Morwen - Talk 19:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Couldn't this image be used again to go with this article? DrWho42 17:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Some parts of the article are written like an advertisement?
Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Star_Trek%3A_Phase_II&diff=260341042&oldid=260260570 --88.74.153.249 (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- If it was a new book, maybe - but we're talking about a book that was published 11 years ago. I'm fine with it. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)