Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Slang: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:13, 12 April 2011

Sexy Slang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, no evidence of notability in independent media. Acroterion (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So adding sources of notability from independent media should prevent this article from deletion? User talk: Sampack 4:49 AM April 6 2011 (EST)

That's the general idea; please feel free to add sources and note it here. Acroterion (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources added: Bloomberg Businessweek, Fox Business, The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch, St. Petersburg Times, and Ebony Magazine. -Sampack (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

undecided does The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch [1] count as a substantial mention if so then I guess I am in the keep column otherwise delete. I couldn't really find anything beyond their own press links [2]Tetron76 (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mentioned in Bloomberg Businessweek and Fox Business. Needs improvement, but notable. Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 20:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on above sources, plus Ebony Magazine (passing), St. Petersburg Times (more substantial). --joe decker ^{talk to me} 22:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (If my vote counts) I believe that this article is worth noting. With the inclusion of notable sources that have been added this article should be considered reliable. -Sampack (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete I'm not sure what priority board-games like these have. It's hard to gauge their encyclopedic value in terms of a global audience. Theo10011 (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources Chzz ► 02:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:07, 12 April 2011 edit Chzz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 115,894 edits →Sexy Slang: Delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:13, 12 April 2011 edit undo Chzz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 115,894 edits →Sexy Slang: O_O That was supposed to be a 'keep'! c/e Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*'''delete''' I'm not sure what priority board-games like these have. It's hard to gauge their encyclopedic value in terms of a global audience. [[User:Theo10011\|Theo10011]] ([[User talk:Theo10011\|talk]]) 02:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)		*'''delete''' I'm not sure what priority board-games like these have. It's hard to gauge their encyclopedic value in terms of a global audience. [[User:Theo10011\|Theo10011]] ([[User talk:Theo10011\|talk]]) 02:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

	* '''~~Delete~~''' Appears to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz\|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz\|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 02:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' Appears to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz\|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz\|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 02:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)