Talk:Continental Army: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Magicpiano (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 199.88.94.2 (talk) to last version by 62.68.71.86 |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Dates seem incorrect== |
==Dates seem incorrect== |
||
"Most of the Continental Army was disbanded on November 3, 1783 after the Treaty of Paris. A small residual force remained at West Point and some frontier outposts, until the Congress created the United States Army by their resolution of June 3, 1783. |
"Most of the Continental Army was disbanded on November 3, 1783 after the Treaty of Paris. A small residual force remained at West Point and some frontier outposts, until the Congress created the United States Army by their resolution of June 3, 1783." |
||
So the United States Army was created before the dissolution of the Continental Army, or is this a typo? |
So the United States Army was created before the dissolution of the Continental Army, or is this a typo? |
||
--[[User:Proteus71|Proteus71]] 21 Apr 2005 |
--[[User:Proteus71|Proteus71]] 21 Apr 2005 |
Revision as of 17:16, 26 April 2011
Military history: North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution C‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
United States History Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Design of article
The ongoing question is how much detail goes in this article, and how much is moved to others? My intent is to use this article to give an overview of the interaction of congress and army, to create a general time sequenced narrative of major events, most of which get their own article. Any suggestions (or better yet help) as to how to complete this are certainly welcome. - Lou I 16:57 21 May 2003 (UTC)
Dates seem incorrect
"Most of the Continental Army was disbanded on November 3, 1783 after the Treaty of Paris. A small residual force remained at West Point and some frontier outposts, until the Congress created the United States Army by their resolution of June 3, 1783." So the United States Army was created before the dissolution of the Continental Army, or is this a typo? --Proteus71 21 Apr 2005
- Fixed typo: the correct date is 3 June 1784. --Kevin Myers 15:42, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
Continental Army's founding date
"The Army was created by a resolution of the Continental Congress on June 15, 1775."
The US Army celebrates their founding as the Continental Army on June 14 (http://www.army.mil/cmh/faq/birth.htm) though it is the case that elements of their founding, such as having a Commander in Chief designated, were conducted on June 15. Is this a typo, or is the author choosing a different date than the US Army for reason?
Flag
Marc Leepson was on MSNBC trying to sell his book Flag ISBN 0312323085 (ISBN given to see if it's reputable or whatnot)... and he talked about the Continental Army first using a flag that had the U.S. flag Stripes... but the stars were replaced with the Union Jack... does anyone know (and can they find a copy) of the flag since it may be good for this article... gren グレン 19:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Uhhh, interestingly enough it () happened to be on the main page... reading more about it I'm not sure if it should be included or not. gren グレン 00:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Ranks
What are the ranks of the Continental Army?--Unknown user
That's a good question; this should clearly be in the article. The ranks are a simpler version of what we know today. Here's a basic list, from top to bottom. —Kevin Myers 04:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
General officers (commanders of large units)
- General and Commander in Chief (Washington)
- Major general (usually commanded a division)
- Brigadier general (usually commanded a brigade)
Field officers (overall operations of a regiment)
- Colonel (commanded a regiment)
- Lieutenant colonel (2nd in command of a regiment)
- Major (particularly responsible for administration)
Company-grade officers
- Captain (commanded a company or troop)
- Lieutenant
- Ensign (known as a cornet in a cavalry troop)
Non-commissioned officers
- Sergeant (3 or 4 per company)
- Corporal (in charge of a squad; 3 or 4 per company)
And finally
- Private (53–76 per company)
the amercian flag is a very important part of the world today.
Recent edit for discussion
The following material, in a list like format, was recently added to the article by an anon editor. Opinions requested. WBardwin 23:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Lexington and Concord, April 19, 1775 Purpose-the Americans were in rebellion about the British taxes and the Intolerable Acts put on them. To punish them British troops could just shoot all the ones rebelling against them. Strategies- warlike preparations were being made by the British. Minute were created by the Americans. They were ready to fight at anytime. It was not known if the British or the Americans shot the first shot. Since it was not known it was known as “The Shot Heard Round the World”. Ten were wounded and eight minutemen were killed. With out shots of victory the British marched on to Concord. The colonists had hidden the rest of the American cannons that the British thought they had taken. Minutemen stored guns in Concord that were found by the Britain Spies. As a surprise attack the British planned to capture the weapons. The Americans also had spies. At about midnight on April 18-19, 1775 about 700 redcoats left Boston. Paul Revere and his friend William Dawes were watching them. They said to everyone “The British are coming!” Morale of Troops-On the way back from Concord the British had little to shoot at. The Americans could shoot from behind trees, walls, and stone fences. This smashed the British. Results-This battle started the war. The British took over Boston. The British had 247 killed or wounded. Only about 100 colonists were dead so they had less than the British.-
Bunker Hill- June 16 1775 at Charlestown, Massachusetts Purpose- To get the control of tallness ignoring Boston Harbor Battle Strategies-on Breeds Hill the night of June 16 colonists came in and put up a fort out of dirt and logs. Morale of Troops- There was 3,800 American troops. "I thank thee, O Lord, for sparing me to fight this day." is what an American was praying. Results-Technically the British won only because they drove off the Americans from Breeds Hill, but since soldiers died the Americans won.
Battle of Saratoga- 1777 Saratoga, New York Cause or Purpose-John Burgoye came to America and plan to win a war. The plan was to capture Hudson River Valley. Battle Strategies- Burgoye started in Canada. Burgoye’s army had said “south to lake Champlain.”Burgoyne brunt back Furt Ticon deroga “The British headed through”. Morale-Before the battle, the British morale was high because they thought their plan would win the war. Results-the victory for the Americans was a turning point in the war. It showed the British strategy failed. The most important part France was convinced that it was safe to join the Americans side
Battle of Trenton December 25, 1776 at Trenton, New Jersey
Purpose-British troops were there in search of Washington but were ruled to take winter quarters in Trenton, Princeton and other New Jersey cities.
Battle Strategies- Washington crossed the Delaware River and took about 2400 troops. The Americans had marched in the night and were ready to plant their attack the next morning. They shocked their enemy by taking about 900 prisoners. They also striked Princeton, too, and they won.
Morale- The American morale was rejuvenated and thousands helped to fight.
Results- After those wins the Americans captured again most of New Jersey.
Bonhomme Richard and Serpis Battle at Sea
September 23, 1779
Cause-To be able to fight on sea against the British.
Battle Strategies-Americans turned merchant ships into warships. The ship of John Paul Jones’, the Bonhomme Richard, fought the British ship named Serapis.
Morale of Troops-The first sea battle was won by the British. After that the Americans had high morale. The morale that helped them win the war was Captain Jones’.
Results-Eventually the Americans forced the British navy men on the Serapis to surrender.
Clearly incorrect date! "1996"
First bullet under "Organization" heading reads, "The Continental Army of 1996, comprising the initial New England Army, organized by Washington into three divisions..."
I don't know the right date, but it is clearly not 1996. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.94.16.2 (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia policy, anonymous people are free to vandalize articles at whim. That's what we had there. Thanks for pointing it out; it's been fixed. —Kevin Myers 19:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
16 Additional battalions
On 27 December 1776, Congress authorized Washington to raise "16 battalions" in addition to the 88 authorized in September 1776. Please see Extra Continental regiments and Additional Continental regiments. Cheers. User talk:Tfhentz 14:10, Nov. 3, 2008 (UTC)
\The Men of the French and Indian War/
…After the War these men some of whom resided in Massachusetts went to their place of begining. Residence perhaps. They were supose to excerise evry now and then, they were still considered a Malitia. They did not and after the begining of dring, they yet continued. A Coffe House was the recomendation through the woman of the Colonies as rather a Tarvern be called, for respect you see.
Well these men went off into the fields now to drink, they became disorderly. Many times they were of repremand. This drunkiness continued. I read that issue was givin to these men and perhaps before 1700 even arived to unite and make thrift of their ability. The authorization came from their commanders of the War they then had faught in. Oliver DeLancey was one of many respectable people to give this orderly a clue. This Perdicament with respect was givin the name Continental, an Army to Police the Area from any or further encrouchm,ents of any Habitat.
Does anyone have issue with this. I hope to regain my inventory for it for it has been lost through a transaction, and I wish to give appology of not being Patient andd finding yet source. Though maybe just through this a recommendation may accure. There was infact another oposition with the Continental Army and the acceptance of a Grouped Malitia being a standing force. I Guess controll of one thing can lead to an oposition of another. Perhaps why even a Group could also have the oportunity of to choose a declaring vantage.
Please help me with this extencive research of whom or what aquired whom. By The way wasn't the Clintons on the British side for some time. And what exactly was Livingston as Brigadeer General suporting, could it have been a recognition of transport, postal service, committee's of correspondence. I Mean he left New Yrok through ssome Powered Faction after loosing power of the mobing personage in New York. Whats up with that. Sure the Law is the Law and if within a Law one may have no choice but to assist a Law, or is it a standing, or forming Law? well till next time Lets not forget before The United States alot of people and documents mention In America, About America, Or such as in conclution of the American Colonies. Isn't the term being used allready as an entity of self being. Also lets remeber The DeLancey Faction in the Creation and Continuance of Law whom represented the People through and with Englan. History is important. No-Taxation-without-Representation. Sure the Sons Of Liberty disolve an Assembly because they would'nt agree with their non-importation act. If there is no one invovled in an assembly of representation then a purpose of law by law has right. Thus the Purpose of continueing Government with the Declaration of Independence. Thus to be Independent of former Government, such be said and delared as a hole as to understand a cercumstance, enableing it a Law. Who's invovled. Now seperation of New York to pennsylvania.~Art Economics HistoryDavid George DeLancey (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- C-Class American Revolutionary War articles
- American Revolutionary War task force articles
- Start-Class United States History articles
- High-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles