Talk:Varkey Vithayathil

Varkey Cardinal Vithayathil?

Isnt it Cardinal Varkey Vithayathil? thunderboltz 15:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Either Cardinal Varkey Vithayathil or Varkey Cardinal Vithayathil is accecptable. Wikipedia's naming conventions specify the Cardinal to be placed before the surname, for consistency in article titles. Gentgeen 03:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Request for undoing of move

Mar Varkey Vithayathil → Varkey Vithayathil — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC) The move from "Varkey Vithayathil" to "Mar Varkey Vithayathil" inserted a title or rank as part of a person's name, similar to naming an article "Bishop John Smith" or "President Barak Obama". "John Smith (bishop)" is accepted in Wikipedia as an article title, but not "Bishop John Smith". Relisted again. Andrewa (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Relisted. Jafeluv (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Esoglou (talk) 08:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Mar is not similar to bishop or other titles. It is a change in the first name. Varkey becomes Mar Varkey when Varkey Vithayathil becomes a bishop. If it were a title, it would be Mar Vithayathil, similar to President Reagan or Archbishop Vithayathil, but such is not the usage. Writing Mar Varkey Vithayathil (writing the correct first name) is not the same as writing Archbishop Varkey Vithayathil (prefixing a title). Karnan (talk) 18:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

If someone is elected to the See of Peter, he takes the title "Pope": "Pope" does not become part of his first name. "Mar" is a title: it does not become part of a man's name. Any more than any other title becomes part of the recipient's name. "Mar" is used with (not as part of) the first name, not the surname. Just as, traditionally, Religious Sister Joan Smith is known as Sister Joan, not as Sister Smith - "Sister" is a title, not part of a name. Just as, when John Smith is knighted, he is referred to as Sir John, not as Sir Smith - "Sir" is a title, not part of a name. Just as with the Portuguese title for a bishop, "Dom", Dom João Pereira is known as Dom João, not as Dom Pereira - "Dom" is a title, not part of a name. Whichever name, first name or family name, a title such as "Mar" is used with, it is still a title, not an additional name or part of a name. Esoglou (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Mar is a kind of title different from Bishop and President; it is different from Father and Sister in that it is never used with the surname; the former two can be used with surname (or informally with the first name, when the first name suffices for identification). It is also different from Pope, which is a title, yet prefixed to a (newly adopted) first name, and where the surname is not used. Note that the wikipaedia articles on popes add the title Pope in the respective article names. (Sir is also a title, which is prefixed to the first name, even though there is a surname. But knights do not bear the title as a denotation of their committed vocations, at least in modern times. Dom is similar, and is not exclusively used for consecrated bishops.) Mar, in contrast, becomes part of the first name in a stronger sense than all these cases, and denotes commitment to a vocation rather than an office. If popes can have their titles prefixed to their article names, so can bishops in the Syriac system. It is also the practice in the Indian system across religions and churches, e.g., Mar Thoma I, Punnathara Mar Dionysious (Mar Thoma XI), Pulikkottil Joseph Mar Dionysious II, Geevarghese Mar Dionysius of Vattasseril, Gheevarghese Mar Gregorios of Parumala, Swami Dayananda Saraswati, Sri Aurobindo, Narayana Guru (a suffix), Maulana Mohammad Ali, etc. Karnan (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I think we must wait for input by others. I can only repeat that, whether attached to a person's first, middle or last name, "Mar" is a title, like "Sir", "Sister", "Cardinal", "Doctor", etc. And you can only repeat that, unlike these other words, "Mar" is not a title but part of a person's name. Esoglou (talk) 10:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Let us wait. To be very short, my position is that it is a kind of title which is very strongly attached to the first name as part of a vocation. (Informally it is best to think of it as becoming part of the first name, but that is not completely precise.) There are not much examples in Western contexts except for Sir and classical knighthood (not the modern version where a sense of vocation is lost) and Dom. In India there are a few other examples as I have quoted. Swami is reasonably well known and spmewhat similar. Karnan (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Are these Indian naming conventions documented anywhere you can show us? So far, we just have two conflicting personal opinions. Obviously, Google is no help with this issue, but some evidence would be nice. Relisting again. Andrewa (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)