User talk:142.167.92.94: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:06, 30 April 2011

you have edited a quotation.

It is not possible to go back in time and change someones words according to the current physics of this world.

I edited my own statement (expanded a sentence without changing its meaning) and I did it before anyone else had time to reply. Which is allowed by Wikipedia's rules. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, you edited direct quotations. What, are you a CPC member, just lie in the face of facts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.26.139 (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You ah=have been reverted yet again for breaking Wikipedia rules. I am not a member of anything other. You, obviously, want to use Wikipedia as a grand stand for your personal opinions. And podium POV pushing is not acceptable on an encyclopedia project whose has a rule of neutrality. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the user 142.167.92.94 (talk) seems to have the need to lie in the face of the facts and use wikipedia for it's personal opinions. He/she probably have serious personal issues and/or is mentaly chalenged. A discusion with this user is nothing but a waste of time. (Carnotaurus044) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

So speaks the POV pusher from Mexico who hasn't bothered to read WP:LEAD and continues to edit based on his personal opinion. Look at toerh pages where there is constant turmoil over infobox entries. The fine details are in the box and the lead sentence remains neitral. As per Wikipedia's rules. 142.167.92.94 (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April, 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 207.6.8.139 (talk) 22:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Actually, the user [[Special:Contributions/142.167.92.94|142.167.92.94]] ([[User talk:142.167.92.94#top|talk]]) seems to have the need to lie in the face of the facts and use wikipedia for it's personal opinions. He/she probably have serious personal issues and/or is mentaly chalenged. A discusion with this user is nothing but a waste of time. ([[User:Carnotaurus044|Carnotaurus044]])  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 22:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :So speaks the POV pusher from Mexico who hasn't bothered to read [[WP:LEAD]] and continues to edit based on his personal opinion. Look at toerh pages where there is constant turmoil over infobox entries. The fine details are in the box and the lead sentence remains neitral. As per Wikipedia's rules. [[Special:Contributions/142.167.92.94|142.167.92.94]] ([[User talk:142.167.92.94#top|talk]]) 22:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
+== April, 2011 ==
+[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>
+In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that:
+# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
+# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
+If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[Special:Contributions/207.6.8.139|207.6.8.139]] ([[User talk:207.6.8.139|talk]]) 22:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)