Talk:Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m reassess as Start-class in WikiProject Film |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Film|American-task-force=yes|class= |
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes|class=Start}} |
||
== Release Date == |
== Release Date == |
Revision as of 14:44, 1 May 2011
Film: American Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Release Date
The release date seems not to be official. Wouldn't it be better to mark the release date as (unoffical) or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KaiMichaelPoppe (talk • contribs) 16:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Director discrepancy
The infobox and the text list two different people as director of this film. Someone knowledgeable should fix that. --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 11:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
True... sort of. Mike Disa is the same person as Michael D'Isa-Hogan, though he is credited as Mike Disa (in Hoodwinked Too).--Joshua H-Star-R (talk) 11:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hoodwinked too or two?
I went to a recent screening of Hoodwinked 2, but it said in the opening credits "Hoodwinked Too: Hood vs. Evil." Is it nessecary to change it yet? --Joshua H-Star-R (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Good question. Reliable sources are usually what we try to go by... ~EdGl ★ 18:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Got it! There are a few sites that say it's Hoodwinked too... except I can't remember the names! --Joshua H-Star-R (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
IMDB has it listed as Hoodwinked Too! Good VS. Evil. How do we go about changing the article URL? Do a redirect, or... ? --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 02:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Er, sorry, I meant Hoodwinked Too! Hood VS. Evil. Point is, it's listed as "Too!" instead of "2:" ... but, yeah, my original question stands. --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 22:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
We could move this page from Hoodwinked 2 to Hoodwinked Too, so if somebody would type in Hoodwinked 2, they'd still get what they were looking for... --Joshua H-Star-R 01:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua H-Star-R (talk • contribs)
3-D?
I have not heard anything about it being in 3-D... --Joshua H-Star-R (talk) 11:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Inaccuracies in Production Info
In the section labled "Production" some of the information appears to be inaccurate. Unfortunately whoever created the section did not provide references so I do not know where they are getting their information and cannot tell how realiable it is. They state that information of a corporate shake-up with the Weinstein Company was not realeased until September 2010 and that until then Mike Disa had been stating that the film's delay was "due to failure in the graphics software at Blue Yonder and that the company was preforming some animation "tweeks"." I suppose that by "corporate shake-up" they are refering to the lawsuit filed by Kanbar Entertainment against the Weinstein Company. However information about the lawsuit was released in April of 2010, not September. Also I have never heard anything about Mike Disa commenting on the film's delay or mentioning any issues with the film's graphics. If anyone knows why the person who created the production section included this information please explain. Otherwise someone should probably remove the inaccurate content and replace it with correct information. --Jpcase (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Studio in infobox
Both onscreen and in the production indicia on the official site, it gives the studio as only Kanbar Entertainment, LLC. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Also known as
In the article it mentions that this film is also known as Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil in 3D and Hoodwinked 2. However is this accurate information? The poster for the film reads Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil in 3D, but is the in 3D part actually meant as part of the title? All posters for films in 3D display the words "in 3D", but this is not meant to be part of the title. It is simply there to provide information about the film to the audience. It is no different from when a poster states that a film is being shown in IMAX or has the release date on it. While the words in 3D are much more prominent on this film's poster than they are on most other movie posters and they are placed directly after the title, which is not done by most other movie posters, I am still not sure that they are meant to be part of the film's title. As for Hoodwinked 2, I have never seen this film be referred to by that title. I do not want to delete this information if anyone feels that they truly are official alternative titles, however if they aren't I believe that they should be deleted. --Jpcase (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)