Power associativity: Difference between revisions
Vladimirdx (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Vladimirdx (talk | contribs) idempotence |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This is stronger than merely saying that (''xx'')''x'' = ''x''(''xx'') for every ''x'' in the algebra, but weaker than [[alternativity]] or associativity, which requires that (''xy'')''z'' = ''x''(''yz'') for every ''x'', ''y'', and ''z'' in the algebra. |
This is stronger than merely saying that (''xx'')''x'' = ''x''(''xx'') for every ''x'' in the algebra, but weaker than [[alternativity]] or associativity, which requires that (''xy'')''z'' = ''x''(''yz'') for every ''x'', ''y'', and ''z'' in the algebra. |
||
Every [[associative algebra]] is obviously power-associative, but so are all other [[alternative algebra]]s (like the [[octonion]]s, which are non-associative) and even some non-alternative algebras like the [[sedenion]]s. |
Every [[associative algebra]] is obviously power-associative, but so are all other [[alternative algebra]]s (like the [[octonion]]s, which are non-associative) and even some non-alternative algebras like the [[sedenion]]s. Any algebra whose elements are [[idempotent]] is also power-associative. |
||
[[Exponentiation]] to the power of any [[natural number]] other than [[0 (number)|zero]] can be defined consistently whenever multiplication is power-associative. |
[[Exponentiation]] to the power of any [[natural number]] other than [[0 (number)|zero]] can be defined consistently whenever multiplication is power-associative. |
||
Revision as of 06:42, 11 May 2011
In abstract algebra, power associativity is a property of a binary operation which is a weak form of associativity.
An algebra (or more generally a magma) is said to be power-associative if the subalgebra generated by any element is associative. Concretely, this means that if an element x is multiplied by itself several times, it doesn't matter in which order the multiplications are carried out, so for instance x(x(xx)) = (x(xx))x = (xx)(xx). This is stronger than merely saying that (xx)x = x(xx) for every x in the algebra, but weaker than alternativity or associativity, which requires that (xy)z = x(yz) for every x, y, and z in the algebra.
Every associative algebra is obviously power-associative, but so are all other alternative algebras (like the octonions, which are non-associative) and even some non-alternative algebras like the sedenions. Any algebra whose elements are idempotent is also power-associative.
Exponentiation to the power of any natural number other than zero can be defined consistently whenever multiplication is power-associative. For example, there is no ambiguity as to whether x3 should be defined as (xx)x or as x(xx), since these are equal. Exponentiation to the power of zero can also be defined if the operation has an identity element, so the existence of identity elements becomes especially useful in power-associative contexts.
A nice substitution law holds for real power-associative algebras with unit, which basically asserts that multiplication of polynomials works as expected. For f a real polynomial in x, and for any a in such an algebra define f(a) to be the element of the algebra resulting from the obvious substitution of a into f. Then for any two such polynomials f and g, we have that (fg) (a) = f(a)g(a).
References
- Albert, A. Adrian (1948), "Power-associative rings", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 64: 552–593, ISSN 0002-9947, MR0027750
- R.D. Schafer, An introduction to non-associative algebras, Dover, 1995, ISBN 0-486-68813-5. Chap.V, pp.128–148.