Talk:Desktop sharing: Difference between revisions
JoeSperrazza (talk | contribs) |
JoeSperrazza (talk | contribs) →TeamViewer free for non-commercial use?: pricing page disagrees with your price changes |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::Thanks for the info. (and, for others' reference, the link is [http://www.teamviewer.com/en/solutions/remoteaccess.aspx http://www.teamviewer.com/en/solutions/remoteaccess.aspx]). [[User:JoeSperrazza|JoeSperrazza]] ([[User talk:JoeSperrazza|talk]]) 02:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
::Thanks for the info. (and, for others' reference, the link is [http://www.teamviewer.com/en/solutions/remoteaccess.aspx http://www.teamviewer.com/en/solutions/remoteaccess.aspx]). [[User:JoeSperrazza|JoeSperrazza]] ([[User talk:JoeSperrazza|talk]]) 02:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
::On a related note, you changed [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Desktop_sharing&diff=428680574&oldid=428590657] the pricing, yet the pricing page, which I referenced in my initial note [http://www.teamviewer.com/en/licensing/index.aspx] disagrees with your change: |
|||
* It was: $749 - $2,690 |
|||
* You changed it to: $689 - $2,629, free for non-commercial use |
|||
* However, the pricing page still says: $749 - $2,690 without a link to the free for non-commercial use part, but you did indicate where that was. |
|||
::I'm going to change the pricing back (but not remove the non-commercial use comment) [[User:JoeSperrazza|JoeSperrazza]] ([[User talk:JoeSperrazza|talk]]) 03:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:16, 12 May 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Desktop sharing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Computing: Software Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Red Links
If nobody has any objection, I propose to remove the redlinked items. If they are not notable enough to have articles then they are not notable enough to list. Of course, if any of them are notable enough but just don't have articles yet then that is different. A stub can be made for any of those. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, so I went ahead and removed the redlinks. Haakon (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Desktop Sharing
Dear Author,
Why there is nothing about HP Remote Graphics Software (HP RGS)? The advantage of HP RGS is usage of special graphics compression method which allows to send 3D OpenGL and DirectX graphics over low-bandwidth links. Also remote sound and USB are supported.
Regards, Kirill Belosludtsev KBelosludtsev@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.38.106.17 (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
TeamViewer free for non-commercial use?
This article noted for some time that TeamViewer was free for "private users". I looked on their website [1] and saw no such language, so I removed that and inserted the pricing [2]. A recent edit [3] has now inserted that it is free for "non-commercial use". Looking again at their pricing page [4], I see no such offer. Before reinserting "free" language, would someone provide a reference for same? Thank you, JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- To the letter, here you go:
- http://i.imgur.com/XZ6Fc.png
- DrSlony (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. (and, for others' reference, the link is http://www.teamviewer.com/en/solutions/remoteaccess.aspx). JoeSperrazza (talk) 02:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- It was: $749 - $2,690
- You changed it to: $689 - $2,629, free for non-commercial use
- However, the pricing page still says: $749 - $2,690 without a link to the free for non-commercial use part, but you did indicate where that was.
- I'm going to change the pricing back (but not remove the non-commercial use comment) JoeSperrazza (talk) 03:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)