Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Teague: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 190.84.79.138 - "" |
Harry Blue5 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Please don't merge. This article is important. Please don't merge. The person who had the idea of merge let me tell : you're a fag. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/190.84.79.138|190.84.79.138]] ([[User talk:190.84.79.138|talk]]) 21:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Please don't merge. This article is important. Please don't merge. The person who had the idea of merge let me tell : you're a fag. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/190.84.79.138|190.84.79.138]] ([[User talk:190.84.79.138|talk]]) 21:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:You have done nothing to explain why this is important to the ''real-world'' (i.e. outside of ''PotC''). Homophobia on it's own achieves nothing. (It doesn't tend to help with anything, really...) [[User:Harry Blue5|Harry Blue5]] <small>([[User talk:Harry Blue5|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harry Blue5|contribs]])</small> 21:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Redirect to [[List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters]]''' Since it was already merged, there's no need to merge it again, so it's simply redirecting. This article does not show [[WP:Notability|notability]]. There does not appear to be any third-party independent reliable sources discussing the character non-trivially, which are needed for a Wikipedia article.. [[User:Harry Blue5|Harry Blue5]] <small>([[User talk:Harry Blue5|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harry Blue5|contribs]])</small> 21:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:32, 20 May 2011
- Captain Teague (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough sources to prove WP:GNG and not enough information per WP:Split to be a individual article when it fits just fine in the List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters article. Is also a minor character in the franchise anyway. I purpose a merge more than a deletion. Jhenderson 777 17:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe a minor character in the films, but not in the franchise.--Max Tomos (talk) 17:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose you are talking about the tie-in novels. I suppose that counts on making him a little essential for the franchise but can you prove that the character is notable. It would also be nice if the article was more than just plot summary. And let's face it all the information about him looks fine in the section of the list article. Jhenderson 777 18:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters, which was already done, but Max reverted it. While very interesting due to his casting, I don't think there would be enough coverage. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Merge as above. This article will never have enough secondary coverage in critical sources to merit his very own page and there's no reason not to include this information on a list of characters. Merge should not have been reverted to begin with. — Chromancer talk/cont 20:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Please don't merge. This article is important. Please don't merge. The person who had the idea of merge let me tell : you're a fag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.84.79.138 (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- You have done nothing to explain why this is important to the real-world (i.e. outside of PotC). Homophobia on it's own achieves nothing. (It doesn't tend to help with anything, really...) Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters Since it was already merged, there's no need to merge it again, so it's simply redirecting. This article does not show notability. There does not appear to be any third-party independent reliable sources discussing the character non-trivially, which are needed for a Wikipedia article.. Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)