Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliviu Craznic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sawyar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:
My conclusion to this debate is that, though only some of the notes and links in the articles are reliable, most indicating other sources to be check, most of the links added above in this page are verifiable and reliable, being links to cultural registered magazines and newspapers, and containing both passing notes and extensive articles about the literary activity of Oliviu Craznic. This article is to be kept, my proposal is to change some of the links and notes inserted in the article with more reliable sources, which can be taken from this page. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nausyk|Nausyk]] ([[User talk:Nausyk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nausyk|contribs]]) 18:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <small>— [[User:Nausyk|Nausyk]] ([[User talk:Nausyk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nausyk|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
My conclusion to this debate is that, though only some of the notes and links in the articles are reliable, most indicating other sources to be check, most of the links added above in this page are verifiable and reliable, being links to cultural registered magazines and newspapers, and containing both passing notes and extensive articles about the literary activity of Oliviu Craznic. This article is to be kept, my proposal is to change some of the links and notes inserted in the article with more reliable sources, which can be taken from this page. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nausyk|Nausyk]] ([[User talk:Nausyk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nausyk|contribs]]) 18:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <small>— [[User:Nausyk|Nausyk]] ([[User talk:Nausyk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nausyk|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>


Keep the article, the notability proved by reliable links to official ISSN magazines. All science fiction magazines wrote about the book (large and many articles) and some of the official cultural magazines ( Familia, Luceafarul de dimineata etc..)did this also.
Keep the article, the notability proved by reliable links to official ISSN magazines. All science fiction magazines wrote about the book (large and many articles) and some of the official cultural magazines ( Familia, Luceafarul de dimineata etc..)did this also. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sawyar|Sawyar]] ([[User talk:Sawyar|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sawyar|contribs]]) 13:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <small>— [[User:Sawyar|Sawyar]] ([[User talk:Sawyar|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sawyar|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>

Revision as of 14:18, 23 May 2011

Oliviu Craznic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's start by going through the notes and links to show why they don't demonstrate notability.

Next, let's note that Craznic receives essentially no mention in Romania's leading newspapers: Evenimentul Zilei, Cotidianul, Adevărul, Jurnalul Naţional, Gândul.

  • These are not cultural magazines. Still there is mentions in other very popular not cultural magazines, as TV Satelit (no.4/2011), TVMania (no. 7/2001), Popcorn (no. 1/2011) and so on, all of these being official magazines, means having and ISSN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihaimarian2 (talkcontribs) 15:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now, let's note that even in Romania's leading literary magazines, he receives no mention or passing mention: 22, România Literară, Observator Cultural.

Let's also note that the article was worked on by four single-purpose accounts.

In fairness, I will observe that Craznic (actual name, Crâznic, I might add) is nominated for something called the Galileo Awards. But the prize doesn't go out for another week, and we have no idea if the award actually means anything. As of now, this is a promotional piece about a man who clearly fails WP:AUTHOR. Should his notability be demonstrated in reliable sources at a later date, the article can be rewritten from those sources. But no notability is apparent at present. - Biruitorul Talk 19:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I note the intense self-promotion, in the article and all over the net, but, unfortunately for the author, he seems to be utterly irrelevant to all reliable sources, and his name is discounted by even the specialized since-fiction and fantasy columns of the Romanian literary press. At best (as Soul Asylum once said:) sometime to return. Dahn (talk) 21:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, Oliviu Craznic is very present and appreciated by science-fiction and literary magazines, as Observator cultural, Luceafarul de dimineata, Suspans, Nautilus, Familia, all this having ISSN (means they are officialy in the National Library), he was more than one time at TVR Cultural, he was at Radio Romania Cultural and at TVRM, he gained awards and his books are in many libraries. All the blogs who mention his name are specialized on literature and on science-fiction literature. Anyway, this is a clear attempt of someone who wants to deleting him (you can see the one who made the proposol, Biruitorul, means in Romanian The Winner, and he says very merry that Craznic Failed). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihaimarian2 (talkcontribs) 15:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Mihaimarian2 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Not to be deleted, keep the article, the author is very well known in our country, due to his constant presence on science fiction media (Nautilus magazine, Suspans magazine, Galileo Magazine etc..) but also on the publications related to cultural activity ( USR, ASB and other official magazines). Praising reviews of his book appear in Familia, Nautilus, Luceafarul de dimineata, Gazeta SF, Jurnalul de Arges, Curierul Vaii Jiului, Ziarul Vaii Jiului, Teenpress, Saptamana Financiara etc.. The main TV and radio cultural channels from Romania, TVR Cultural, TVR1 and Radio Romania Cultural presented more than once interviews and news about the author. He also keeps public conferences and readings, being invited by official writers clubs like Club de proza (romanian museum of literature) and others.

The links below are quite enough for me, though there is more than this, if you want to check out.

There are in Romania only four official magazines registered to National library (ISSN)dedicated to SF, fantasy &horror. All these four official magazines have extensive articles and many mentions and recordings about Oliviu Craznic. These magazines are Nautilus, Suspans, Galileo and Gazeta SF. Other important magazine is SRSFF which is not officially registered at National Library with ISSN. Still this magazine also mentiones briefly the activity of Oliviu Craznic in some articles. He also is invited periodically by the SRSFF members at Prospectart and other events so, as long as the all four official sf publications are referring to the author's activity in many and large articles, the notability is more than clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CptSisko (talkcontribs) 15:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC) CptSisko (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment - two new sockpuppets have arrived, one of whom has inserted four further links into the article. One is an Amazon sale page (no comment) two are blog posts by Craznic (same) and one is a roundup of blog posts (sigh). We're dealing with a frenzied self-promoter, but one who apparently hasn't read WP:RS, WP:V, WP:SELFPUB, WP:N, WP:AUTH and a slew of other policies. - Biruitorul Talk 17:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, again - the presence on Amazon atests some notability. The blog posts by Craznic contain links to other blog post, and also to an official publication with ISSN. And you can see above I added DOZENS of links from OFFICIAL publications WITH ISSN. What is so hard to understand? The one who put the notes was not inspired in choosing more blog posts than official publications, but this not makes Craznic less present in official magazines. Sorry to dissapoint, Biruitorule. However, let's let aside the accusations and let us let the administrators check the links added in this discussion (Observator cultural, Nautilus, Familia, Suspans, Luceafrul de dimineata mainly - all being OFFICIAL MAGAZINES WITH ISSN, not blogs, not sites, not anything like this. ) Note: I just added in the article only links to official registered publications of Romanian National Library, changing most of the links as Nausyk suggested. We have now a majority of reliable and verifiable links, all of them related to well-known and respect cultural magazines, some dedicated to sci-fi, some to mainstream, all of them writing extensively and/or often about Oliviu Craznic. I ask the administrators to check those links and take the decision based on them and on the other links above, not on arguments ill-intended. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihaimarian2 (talkcontribs) 17:57, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My conclusion to this debate is that, though only some of the notes and links in the articles are reliable, most indicating other sources to be check, most of the links added above in this page are verifiable and reliable, being links to cultural registered magazines and newspapers, and containing both passing notes and extensive articles about the literary activity of Oliviu Craznic. This article is to be kept, my proposal is to change some of the links and notes inserted in the article with more reliable sources, which can be taken from this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nausyk (talkcontribs) 18:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Nausyk (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep the article, the notability proved by reliable links to official ISSN magazines. All science fiction magazines wrote about the book (large and many articles) and some of the official cultural magazines ( Familia, Luceafarul de dimineata etc..)did this also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawyar (talkcontribs) 13:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Sawyar (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]