Talk:Nautilus-X: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:10, 23 May 2011

Spaceflight Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nice article

I was looking for a Nautilus-X wiki article and google pointed me here. This is a heck of a start. It's better than a lot of pages out there that aren't marked 'stub'. I'd be happy to contribute when it goes prime time. The only correction I have is that in the third image, Nautilus-X Extended duration explorer.png, one of the labels should be spelled 'descent' vs 'decent'. I'd fix it myself, but I'm no good with image editing. I try to stick to code and article text. aremisasling (talk) 04:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I just plan on adding a bit more information, and then I'll move it to the article name space within the next couple of hours. I'll be more then glad if you can contribute then as well! Xionbox^₪ 15:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo. I wonder if the NASA gang knows about this. I've been in communication with the JSC and Langley folks, and will try to get them to keep us posted on any reliably sourced materials we can use. Raising the consciousness of the interested community outside NASA seems like a good idea, if it can be done within Wikipedia's POV & COI rules of course. (Being a fanatic myself, I must keep these issues in mind.) Wwheaton (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very interesting article, and I'm more than willing to provide help when necessary. Message me if you need a hand. --Rsteilberg 05:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. 99.73.37.190 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Revision as of 15:09, 23 May 2011 edit 99.73.37.190 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:10, 23 May 2011 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,460 edits m Dating comment by 99.73.37.190 - "" Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::This is a very interesting article, and I'm more than willing to provide help when necessary. Message me if you need a hand. --Rsteilberg 05:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)		::This is a very interesting article, and I'm more than willing to provide help when necessary. Message me if you need a hand. --Rsteilberg 05:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

	I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/99.73.37.190\|99.73.37.190]] ([[User talk:99.73.37.190\|talk]])		I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/99.73.37.190\|99.73.37.190]] ([[User talk:99.73.37.190\|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|undated]] comment added 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->