Talk:Pet Airways: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:14, 24 May 2011

Aviation: Airlines Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Miami Unassessed

	This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Pet Airways appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 April 2009 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April.

Wikipedia

So...

...this is just for pets only? The owners don't get to travel with their pets? howcheng {chat} 18:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly.—Chris! _ct 21:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hubs

Can these really be considered hubs if they are the only destinations served when PetAirways starts service? Thanks,

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

15:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

"Pets may not check owners in checked baggage"

I had added this text previously, which was reverted:

"Human owners are strictly prohibited from accompaniment; further, pets may not check owners in checked baggage."

I would like to keep this text (or, with your help, an improved version) as I think it improves the quality of the article. Just my $0.02. Thanks, cheers! --Inetpuppy (talk) 00:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit that it was quite humorous, but unless its a company motto, or something that the owners said, I'm afraid it can't really stay without some sort of reference. --Hourick (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea! I will e-mail [press@petairways.com] to suggest the motto. --Inetpuppy (talk) 06:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Can these really be considered hubs if they are the only destinations served when PetAirways starts service? Thanks, <p><font face="segoe print, sans-serif"><span style="color:lime">'''Ishwasafish'''<sup> <span style="color:teal">''click [[User:Ishwasafish|here]]!!!''</span> </sup></span></font></p> 15:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
+== "Pets may not check owners in checked baggage" ==
-== A factual statement (though there is not a media source for it) ==
 I had added this text previously, which was reverted:
 * "Human owners are strictly prohibited from accompaniment; further, pets may not check owners in checked baggage."
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 :I have to admit that it was quite humorous, but unless its a company motto, or something that the owners said, I'm afraid it can't really stay without some sort of reference. --[[User:Hourick|Hourick]] ([[User talk:Hourick|talk]]) 18:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
+:: Great idea! I will e-mail [press@petairways.com] to suggest the motto. --[[User:Inetpuppy|Inetpuppy]] ([[User talk:Inetpuppy|talk]]) 06:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)