Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
GAN |
m Transcluding GA review |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|02:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">'''[[User:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">Dough</font>]][[User talk:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">48</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">72</font>]]'''</span>|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=|note=}} |
{{GA nominee|02:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">'''[[User:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">Dough</font>]][[User talk:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">48</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">72</font>]]'''</span>|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=onreview|note=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}} |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|importance=low |
|importance=low |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1}} |
Revision as of 13:01, 24 May 2011
Willow Grove Park Mall is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Dough4872 at 02:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Pennsylvania C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Philadelphia C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Shopping Centers C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It covers the major aspects of the subject.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article maintains a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are freely licenced and used well.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: