Jump to content

Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GAN
GA bot (talk | contribs)
m Transcluding GA review
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|02:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">'''[[User:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">Dough</font>]][[User talk:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">48</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">72</font>]]'''</span>|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=|note=}}
{{GA nominee|02:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="background:#604007; padding:2px">'''[[User:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">Dough</font>]][[User talk:Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">48</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|<font color="#EEBB80">72</font>]]'''</span>|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=onreview|note=}}
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=low}}
Line 7: Line 7:
|importance=low
|importance=low
}}
}}

{{Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1}}

Revision as of 13:01, 24 May 2011

WikiProject iconPennsylvania C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhiladelphia C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconShopping Centers C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is well written and maintains a good style throughout.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It covers the major aspects of the subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are freely licenced and used well.
  7. Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: