Work-to-rule: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:36, 25 May 2011

Work-to-rule is an industrial action in which employees do no more than the minimum required by the rules of their contract, and follow safety or other regulations to the letter in order to cause a slowdown rather than to serve their purpose. This is considered less disruptive than a strike or lockout; and just obeying the rules is less susceptible to disciplinary action. Notable examples have included nurses refusing to answer telephones and police officers refusing to issue citations. Refusal to work overtime, travel on duty or sign up to other tasks requiring employee assent are other manifestations of using work-to-rule as industrial action.

Sometimes the term "rule-book slowdown" is used in a slightly different sense than "work-to-rule": the former involves applying to the letter rules that are normally set aside or interpreted less literally to increase efficiency; the latter, refraining from activities which are customary but not required by rule or job description but the terms may be used synonymously.

Sometimes work-to-rule can be considered by employers as malicious compliance as they pursue legal action against workers.

In some languages (e.g. Polish, Russian, Finnish and Hebrew) it is known as "Italian strike", as it is believed that it was first utilized in Italy in 1904. In Italy, it is known as "sciopero bianco" or "white strike".

References

External links

Work To Rule: What Does It Mean? strike information, Public Service Alliance of Canada BC, psacbc.com
Work-to-rule organise, libcom.org
Public sector workers begin work-to-rule RTÉ News, rte.ie

This article related to a strike action or other labor dispute is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Refimprove|date=November 2007}}
-'''Work-to-rule''' is an [[industrial action]] in which [[employee]]s do no more than the minimum required by the rules of their contract, and follow safety or other regulations to the letter in order to cause a slowdown rather than to serve their purpose. This is considered less disruptive than a [[Strike action|strike]] or [[lockout (industry)|lockout]]; and just obeying the rules is less susceptible to disciplinary action. Notable examples have included nurses refusing to answer telephones and police officers refusing to issue citations.
+'''Work-to-rule''' is an [[industrial action]] in which [[employee]]s do no more than the minimum required by the rules of their contract, and follow safety or other regulations to the letter in order to cause a slowdown rather than to serve their purpose. This is considered less disruptive than a [[Strike action|strike]] or [[lockout (industry)|lockout]]; and just obeying the rules is less susceptible to disciplinary action. Notable examples have included nurses refusing to answer telephones and police officers refusing to issue citations. Refusal to work overtime, travel on duty or sign up to other tasks requiring employee assent are other manifestations of using work-to-rule as [[industrial action]].
 Sometimes the term "rule-book [[slowdown]]" is used in a slightly different sense than "work-to-rule": the former involves applying to the letter rules that are normally set aside or interpreted less literally to increase efficiency; the latter, refraining from activities which are customary but not required by rule or [[job description]] but the terms may be used synonymously.