Talk:2011 Fuzhou, Jiangxi bombings: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:19, 27 May 2011

China Unassessed

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Censorship

To Found5dollar Please list the strong relationship between the incident and the censorship. I strongly hate internet censorship, but we should not emphasize this here. If you can type and read Chinese, you can easily find various Chinese news about this incident. Truthdigger 04:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

It is not beign emphasized, a few sentances, sourced, about how first responders to the site dealt with the media by erasing pictures and confiscating materials is extremely notable. The burden of proof to it's non-notability lies of you. The information is sourced and is related to the event. Once the article expands, hopefully with your help, a smaller percent will be devoted to the censorship because the rest of the article will have more mass. Please do not delete the section again untill you can prove that sourced information directly related to peopel involved with the event does not belong. --Found5dollar (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't give the strong connection between a bombing and the censorship. And obviously, you can easily access to this incident both in English and Chinese. So I will insist deleting the unimportant and not-related parts and focus on the truth and progress behind this incident. I hope you can do some work to improve this part. Truthdigger 04:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MECHEMENG (talk • contribs)

There was a bombing, people took pictures of it, reliable sources say the cops deleted said pictures. Censorship. I don't know how one can have any stronger of a connection.--Found5dollar (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use feel, please give reasons. List the logical relationship. Thanks.Don't be the judge. (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I found that this incident may match up the requirement of this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N/CA#Criminal_acts

Maybe this is not suitable for an article,a better place to put his article is wikinews. Don't be the judge. (talk) 05:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not fall under "Criminal Acts." Please do not blank the page again. It is counterproductive.--Found5dollar (talk) 05:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :::By the way, I found that this incident may match up the requirement of this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N/CA#Criminal_acts
 Maybe this is not suitable for an article,a better place to put his article is wikinews. [[User:Respecteveryone|Don&#39;t be the judge.]] ([[User talk:Respecteveryone|talk]]) 05:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
+:::: This article does not fall under "Criminal Acts." Please do not blank the page again. It is counterproductive.--[[User:Found5dollar|Found5dollar]] ([[User talk:Found5dollar|talk]]) 05:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)