Jump to content

Talk:Net (textile): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m add template
 
HollyI (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|importance=high
|importance=high
}}
}}
Even as a stub this lacks. Its orientation is industrial, there is no history, and it confuses netting with crocheting (filet and tambour are both crochet: in fact, tambour is the older name before "crochet" was used. It speaks not at all of the method of needle and mesh, let alone fisherman's nets at the macro end of the scale, nor of its use as the basis of guipure.

Aaaagh! Do I have to do this? I came here to *get* information, not write something.

[[User:HollyI|HollyI]] ([[User talk:HollyI|talk]]) 18:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:06, 6 June 2011

WikiProject iconTextile arts Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Even as a stub this lacks. Its orientation is industrial, there is no history, and it confuses netting with crocheting (filet and tambour are both crochet: in fact, tambour is the older name before "crochet" was used. It speaks not at all of the method of needle and mesh, let alone fisherman's nets at the macro end of the scale, nor of its use as the basis of guipure.

Aaaagh! Do I have to do this? I came here to *get* information, not write something.

HollyI (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]