Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Gray OAM: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Australia |
GiantSnowman (talk | contribs) m better category for AfD |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Rob Gray OAM]]=== |
===[[Rob Gray OAM]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
:{{la|Rob Gray OAM}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Gray OAM|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 June 4#{{anchorencode:Rob Gray OAM}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|Rob Gray OAM}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Gray OAM|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 June 4#{{anchorencode:Rob Gray OAM}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
Revision as of 00:36, 8 June 2011
- Rob Gray OAM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just being awarded the OAM is not enough to prove sufficient notability on wikipedia. This has been discussed before - see Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/Archive_36#OAMs_for_notability for a recent discussion. Is he the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources? I don't think so - his OAM seems to be for his work in the navy which almost certainly wouldn't have been reported outside in independent sources. The-Pope (talk) 11:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)