Ivo Andrić

File:IvoAndricPortrait.jpg

Portrait of Ivo Andrić by Kosta Hakman

Ivo Andrić (Cyrillic alphabet: Иво Андрић; October 9, 1892–March 13, 1975) was a Serbian and Croatian and notably Yugoslav novelist, short story writer, and the 1961 winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature. His novels Bridge on the Drina and Bosnian Chronicle / The Days of the Consuls dealt with life in Bosnia under Ottoman Empire. Ivo is among the greatest Serbo-Croatian writers.

Biography

Andrić was born on October 9, 1892, in the village of Dolac near Travnik, Bosnia, then part of Austria-Hungary and today part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. His parents, Antun Andrić and Katarina Pejić, were Roman Catholic Croats. When Andrić was two years old, his father died. Because his mother was too poor to support him, he was raised by his aunt and uncle in the eastern Bosnian town of Višegrad on the river Drina. There he saw the Ottoman Bridge, later made famous in the novel The Bridge on the Drina.

Andrić attended Sarajevo's gymnasium and later studied at the universities in Zagreb, Vienna, Krakow and Graz. Because of his political activities, Andrić was imprisoned by the Austrian government during World War I (first in Maribor and later in the Doboj detention camp) alongside civilian Serbs and pro-Serb southern Slavs.

Under the newly-formed Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) Andrić became a civil servant, first in the Ministry of Faiths and then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he pursued a successful diplomatic career, as Deputy Foreign Minister and later Ambassador to Germany. Ivo greatly opposed the movement of Stjepan Radić, the president of the Croatian Peasant Party, at ocasions calling the people that support him as fools that follow the footsteps of a blind dog. His ambassadorship ended in 1941 after the German invasion of Yugoslavia. During World War II, Andrić lived quietly in Belgrade, completing the three of his most famous novels which were published in 1945, including The Bridge on the Drina.

After Wthe war, Andrić held a number of ceremonial posts in the new Communist government of Yugoslavia, including that of the member of the presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In 1961, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature "for the epic force with which he has traced themes and depicted human destinies drawn from the history of his country."

Following the death of his wife in 1968, he began reducing his public activities. As the time went by, he became increasingly ill and eventually died on March 13, 1975, in Belgrade (then Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and today Serbia and Montenegro).

Works

File:Ivo Andric.PNG

Ivo Andrić

The material for his works was mainly drawn from the history, folklore and culture of his native Bosnia. Andrić began writing in Croatian, but, like many other Croatian writers in the period immediately after the founding of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, he switched to Ekavian dialect, considered exclusively Serbian. Some are of the opinion that, as a supporter of one Serbo-Croatian language, this was for him a change from the Western to the Eastern form of the same language. On the other hand, others point to the fact that, upon closer scrutiny, his drafts for novels and stories reveal Andrić "purged", as far as he could, his texts of characteristically Croatian orthographic, syntactical, morphological and lexical traits-in short, he consciously switched from one language to another. Had he been a believer in one, Serbo-Croatian language, he would have, in all probability, "mixed" freely both languages's idioms on all levels, from phonology to semantics-something which didn't happen. After the political turmoil in the Kingdom in the late 1920s most Croats abandoned Ekavian, but Andrić didn't follow suit. Many of his works have been translated into English, the best known are the following:

• The Bridge on the Drina (Na Drini ćuprija, 1945; trans. 1959)
• The Woman from Sarajevo (Gospođica, 1945; trans. 1965)
• The Vizier's Elephant (Priča o vezirovom slonu, 1948; trans. 1962)

Some of his other popular works include:

• The Journey of Alija Đerzelez (Put Alije Đerzeleza, 1920)
• The Days of the Consuls (Travnička hronika, 1945)
• The Damned Yard (Prokleta avlija, 1954)
• Omer-Pasha Latas (Omerpaša Latas, released posthumously in 1977)

Classification

Andrić belongs to those writers that are hard to classify: he was both a Serbian and Croatian writer, wrote in Serbian (predominantly) and Croatian (earlier works of poetry and novellas, ca. 30 % of his opus), although in deference to his vision we may say that he intended to write in Serbo-Croatian rather than Serbian; he was a believer in Yugoslav unity and quasi-racial Slavic nationalism before WWI and. His political career, combined with extraliterary factors, contributed to the controversy that still surrounds his work. However, a fair assessment of should not overlook the following facts and evaluations:

• Andrić is at his best in short stories, novellas and essayist meditative prose. Brilliant aphorisms and meditations, collected in his early poetic prose (Nemiri/"Anxieties") and, particularly, posthumously published Znakovi pored puta/"Signs near the travel-road" are great examples of a melancholic consciousness contemplating the universals in human condition - not unlike Andrić's chief influence Kierkegaard. His best short stories and novellas are located in his native Bosnia and Herzegovina and frequently center on collisions between the three main Bosnian nations: Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks. The latter are in his fiction almost exclusively referred to as "Turks". Although social and denominational tensions are the scene for the majority of stories, Andrić's shorter fictions cannot be reduced to a sort of regional chronicle: rooted frequently in rather prosaic and pedestrian Bosnian Franciscan chronicles, they are expressions of a vision of life, because for Andrić, as for other great regionalist authors like Hardy or Hawthorne, the regional irradiates the universal.

• yet, with the collapse of Yugoslavia other, until then suppressed, doubts about Andrić's work began to pop up. The commonest charge is as follows: Bosniaks, or Bosnian Muslims are portrayed stereotypically in Andrić's work and in a hostile and condescending manner. Some circles of Bosnian Muslim intelligentsia had raised these accusations to ludicrous extremes, turning Andrić into a Greater Serbian propagandist and pamphleteer. Suffice to say - Andrić was primarily a fiction writer and such generalizations are essentially meaningless. But, they do, to a degree, invalidate Andrić's stature as a writer. Shallow stereotypes of Bosnian Muslims who are depicted as borderline psychotic oversensual "Orientals" abound even in his best fiction, which has proven to be detrimental in the re-assessment of his literary stature at the end of the 20th century.

• Another, more amusing post-Yugoslav literary event is Andrić's posthumous placement: since the project of Yugoslav literature collapsed (just like Czechoslovak or Soviet "literatures"), a squabble about "who Andrić belongs to?" only began. Serbian culture and tradition have the strongest claim: The majority of his works were written in the Serbian language and he was, as far as the former Yugoslav area is concerned, influenced decisively by Serbian cultural icons such as Vuk Karadžić and Petar Petrović Njegoš, who both figured in a few Andrić's essays. Accordingly to Serbian critic Borislav Mihailović-Mihiz, Andrić allowed him to be included in Mihailović's "Anthology Of Serbian Poets Between The Two World Wars" ("Српски песници између два рата"). Croatian curricula at high schools and universities have put Andrić among other writers in Croatian literature departments and programs: the arguments seem to be mostly "genetic" (Andrić was of Croatian origin and in young adulthood declared himself a Croat - for instance, he participated in a book Hrvatska mlada lirika/"Croatian young poetry", 1914); also, great part of his best earlier work was written in the Croatian language (as different from Serbian Ijekavian language writers such as Petar Kočić or Aleksa Šantić) and Andrić didn't alter his early works in later editions; and, the role of "chorus" or moral conscience, i.e. authorial voice in the major part of his work are Bosnian Croat Franciscans. Be as it may, Andrić's work is now in the official curricula of Croat and Serb literature programs, and, grudgingly, in that of Bosnian Muslims. Since aesthetic sensibilities have significantly altered in past decades, a traditionalist storyteller like Andrić is both a politically controversial figure and literarily a somewhat marginal presence: Many Croatian historians of literature have never considered him an equal to Miroslav Krleža, while Serbs affirm aesthetic primacy of Miloš Crnjanski and Bosniaks or Bosnian Muslims of Mehmed Selimović - a Muslim writer who, like the Croat Andrić, "opted" for Serbdom during a major part of his life. Where will this literary-political pendulum finally end, it is too early to predict.

External link

• Andric at NobelPrize.org
• Books of Ivo Andric
• Serbian website