Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BestAddress HTML Editor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software |
Delete |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This doesnt appear to be notable. I can only find one source that looks usable[http://www.computerra.ru/gid/raznosoft/327139/] and no book sources. There are a few product reviews online, but they are not in depth and dont have an author. It has been known by this name for over five years, according to the 2005 report by the creator, which is used as a reference on the article. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 07:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC) |
This doesnt appear to be notable. I can only find one source that looks usable[http://www.computerra.ru/gid/raznosoft/327139/] and no book sources. There are a few product reviews online, but they are not in depth and dont have an author. It has been known by this name for over five years, according to the 2005 report by the creator, which is used as a reference on the article. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 07:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
* '''Delete''' - Per nominator. Searching for the product's name in Google Web only returns unique 937 results, most of which are shareware sites or are sites involved in software piracy. The remaining are blogs, forums, and sources that fail [[WP:RS]]. The article claims the product has to have won 40 awards, the lack of coverage is suspicious and suggests advertising intent. Searching for ''"BestAddress HTML Editor" AND award -"Creating websites has never been easier with this multi-award-winning HTML editor"'' (to filter out shareware sites with the standard product description), Google returns 426 results, none of which appear to be RS. [[User:Rilak|Rilak]] ([[User talk:Rilak|talk]]) 09:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:09, 11 June 2011
- BestAddress HTML Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This doesnt appear to be notable. I can only find one source that looks usable[1] and no book sources. There are a few product reviews online, but they are not in depth and dont have an author. It has been known by this name for over five years, according to the 2005 report by the creator, which is used as a reference on the article. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nominator. Searching for the product's name in Google Web only returns unique 937 results, most of which are shareware sites or are sites involved in software piracy. The remaining are blogs, forums, and sources that fail WP:RS. The article claims the product has to have won 40 awards, the lack of coverage is suspicious and suggests advertising intent. Searching for "BestAddress HTML Editor" AND award -"Creating websites has never been easier with this multi-award-winning HTML editor" (to filter out shareware sites with the standard product description), Google returns 426 results, none of which appear to be RS. Rilak (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)