User talk:Cláudio César Dias Baptista: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:17, 11 June 2011

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer is already there

Your answer is already there.Cláudio César Dias Baptista (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cláudio César Dias Baptista. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 15:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cláudio César Dias Baptista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My conduct "is not connected in any way with the block". I am not the person who created the fake individual in En Wiki nor I am responsible for the acts of any person that not myself. The block is an insult to my honor and is based in probabilities, not in facts, as an exactly identical IP. Cláudio César Dias Baptista (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My conduct "is not connected in any way with the block". I am not the person who created the fake individual in En Wiki nor I am responsible for the acts of any person that not myself. The block is an insult to my honor and is based in probabilities, not in facts, as an exactly identical IP. [[User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista|Cláudio César Dias Baptista]] ([[User talk:Cláudio César Dias Baptista#top|talk]]) 18:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My conduct "is not connected in any way with the block". I am not the person who created the fake individual in En Wiki nor I am responsible for the acts of any person that not myself. The block is an insult to my honor and is based in probabilities, not in facts, as an exactly identical IP. [[User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista|Cláudio César Dias Baptista]] ([[User talk:Cláudio César Dias Baptista#top|talk]]) 18:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My conduct "is not connected in any way with the block". I am not the person who created the fake individual in En Wiki nor I am responsible for the acts of any person that not myself. The block is an insult to my honor and is based in probabilities, not in facts, as an exactly identical IP. [[User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista|Cláudio César Dias Baptista]] ([[User talk:Cláudio César Dias Baptista#top|talk]]) 18:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 15:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
 }}
+{{unblock|My conduct "is not connected in any way with the block". I am not the person who created the fake individual in En Wiki nor I am responsible for the acts of any person that not myself. The block is an insult to my honor and is based in probabilities, not in facts, as an exactly identical IP. [[User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista|Cláudio César Dias Baptista]] ([[User talk:Cláudio César Dias Baptista#top|talk]]) 18:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)}}