Talk:Incense and Peppermints: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:29, 12 June 2011

Songs Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

b/w ?

"My Flash on You" b/w "Fortune Teller" — what does b/w mean? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 23:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

b/w = backed with. It's standard recording industry speak when listing a single's A-side and B-side. Maybe it should be changed though, to make it more obvious for those who have perhaps not heard the term before. You must've realised that it was referring to the A-side and B-side of each single though, no? --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 10:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the fast reply! No, call me stupid, but I thought it was some term meaning "working title" or something. Industry lingo definitely can hamper an article's accessibility. I think "backed with" can be used, as long as it's clarified as to what it means (within the article). – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 10:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually using the words "backed with" might be a bit clunky, I think. As far as I can see, either we just seperate the different sides with a slash symbol ("My Flash on You"/"Fortune Teller") or we just list the A-sides of each release to avoid the confusion entirely. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:24, 11 June 2011 edit Keraunoscopia (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers 18,087 edits →b/w ?: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:29, 12 June 2011 edit undo Kohoutek1138 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 10,960 edits →b/w ?: reply Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Hey, thanks for the fast reply! No, call me stupid, but I thought it was some term meaning "working title" or something. Industry lingo definitely can hamper an article's accessibility. I think "backed with" can be used, as long as it's clarified as to what it means (within the article). – <font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia\|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia\|xies]]</font></sub></i> 10:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)		::Hey, thanks for the fast reply! No, call me stupid, but I thought it was some term meaning "working title" or something. Industry lingo definitely can hamper an article's accessibility. I think "backed with" can be used, as long as it's clarified as to what it means (within the article). – <font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia\|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia\|xies]]</font></sub></i> 10:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

			:::Actually using the words "backed with" might be a bit clunky, I think. As far as I can see, either we just seperate the different sides with a slash symbol ("My Flash on You"/"Fortune Teller") or we just list the A-sides of each release to avoid the confusion entirely. --[[User:Kohoutek1138\|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138\|talk]]) 09:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)