Talk:Dead Fantasy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:55, 12 June 2011

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Television NA‑class

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Video games NA‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

NA

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Rat Race (video game) (5 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (4 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (5 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (4 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability

Article needs mainstream references. Personally I would think the author is more significant than one of his series. Problem is, Wikipedians - esp. the draconic delete delete delete types, are very enamoured of print media and "mainstream" references. The man and his works inhabit a purely internet/geek domain which won't show up much in the NY Times or academic research printed books. Pär Larsson (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, the character information needs to go; all that stuff is completely irrelevant to the article at hand and is a rather poor duplication of what is already in other character articles. –MuZemike 22:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have got to second that; the character section is little more than a fanboy descent into fantasy storytelling. It is a poorly written attempt at interpretation of the narrative based on the (article's) author's experience with the original source fiction for the characters. But those characters presumably already have fleshed-out descriptions in the articles for those media, and as for the nature of those same characters in their reinterpretation for Dead Fantasy, the character information provided is all inference and guess work, and superfluous in any event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.128.92 (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Article needs mainstream references. Personally I would think the author is more significant than one of his series. Problem is, Wikipedians - esp. the draconic delete delete delete types, are very enamoured of print media and "mainstream" references. The man and his works inhabit a purely internet/geek domain which won't show up much in the NY Times or academic research printed books. [[User:Parjlarsson|Pär Larsson]] ([[User talk:Parjlarsson|talk]]) 18:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 :At the very least, the character information needs to go; all that stuff is ''completely'' irrelevant to the article at hand and is a rather poor duplication of what is already in other character articles. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
-::Have got to second that; the character section is little more than a fanboy descent into fantasy storytelling. It is a poorly written attempt at interpretation of the narrative based on the (article's) author's experience with the original source fiction for the characters. But those characters presumably already have fleshed-out descriptions in the articles for those media, and as for the nature of those same characters in their reinterpretation for Dead Fantasy, the character information provided is all inference and guess work, and superfluous in any event.
+::Have got to second that; the character section is little more than a fanboy descent into fantasy storytelling. It is a poorly written attempt at interpretation of the narrative based on the (article's) author's experience with the original source fiction for the characters. But those characters presumably already have fleshed-out descriptions in the articles for those media, and as for the nature of those same characters in their reinterpretation for Dead Fantasy, the character information provided is all inference and guess work, and superfluous in any event.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.124.128.92|68.124.128.92]] ([[User talk:68.124.128.92|talk]]) 15:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->