User talk:Bdgls: Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Thanks for your feedback. Will try to fix that leaving only facts and related sourcing. |
Thanks for your feedback. Will try to fix that leaving only facts and related sourcing. |
||
[[User:Bdgls|Bdgls]] ([[User talk:Bdgls#top|talk]]) 13:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:12, 23 June 2011
Welcome!
Hello, Bdgls, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ourinternet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ourinternet
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ourinternet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
(I don't know for certain it is from you, but I think it is a reasonable guess.)
Message added SPhilbrickT 12:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Feedback on User:Bdgls/Ourinternet
There are several examples of wording that are problematic:
- "The company is one of the leading providers" You can't say this without adequate sourcing, and even if you can find adequate sourcing, many editors (including myself) don't think it is appropriate wording. It is what the marketing department says, not an encyclopedia.
- "packed with advanced features" In a word, no. Not acceptable.
- "Next step forward" See above
- "carving out a new niche" See above
- "Our Internet cloud servers are a good alternative" Not acceptable with sourcing, and even then, not advisable.
- "without investing a fortune" This is advertising not encyclopedia phrasing --SPhilbrickT 12:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. Will try to fix that leaving only facts and related sourcing.