Talk:Eryx conicus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:36, 27 June 2011

Amphibians and Reptiles Start‑class Low‑importance

	Eryx conicus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problem with "Description"

The first two ¶s of the "Description", which are unsourced, do not seem to fit this snake. The first ¶ sounds like a description (diagnosis) of the genus Eryx (sensu lato), probably from Boulenger's Fauna of British India, of which I don't have a copy. The second ¶ is almost exactly the same as Boulenger's description of Eryx johnii in his 1893 Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History), Volume I, page 127. Perhaps someone could move these ¶s to the proper WP articles, Eryx (genus) and E. johnii respectively, and then delete them from this article.74.109.236.194 (talk) 04:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{AARTalk|class=Start|importance=Low|needs-photo=no|needs-taxobox=no|nested=no}}
 ==Problem with "Description"==
-The first two ¶s of the "Description", which are unsourced, do not seem to fit this snake. The first ¶ sounds like a description of the genus Eryx (sensu latu), probably from Boulenger's Fauna of British India, of which I don't have a copy. The second ¶ is almost exactly the same as Boulenger's description of Eryx johnii in his 1893 Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History), Volume I, page 127. Perhaps someone could move these ¶s to the proper WP articles, Eryx (genus) and E. johnii respectively, and then delete them from this article.[[Special:Contributions/74.109.236.194|74.109.236.194]] ([[User talk:74.109.236.194|talk]]) 04:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
+The first two ¶s of the "Description", which are unsourced, do not seem to fit this snake. The first ¶ sounds like a description (diagnosis) of the genus Eryx (sensu lato), probably from Boulenger's Fauna of British India, of which I don't have a copy. The second ¶ is almost exactly the same as Boulenger's description of Eryx johnii in his 1893 Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History), Volume I, page 127. Perhaps someone could move these ¶s to the proper WP articles, Eryx (genus) and E. johnii respectively, and then delete them from this article.[[Special:Contributions/74.109.236.194|74.109.236.194]] ([[User talk:74.109.236.194|talk]]) 04:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)