User talk:Lm945

An additional message to you has been placed on the discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gajaad (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

We placed a message on the discussion page where you had written a message. We requested that you please stop removing the fatheroflions.org link. You wrote a message the day before stating that persons should not be mentioning Gareth Patterson in the film section with the Walk with Lions movie. We have not added his name after reading your comments. However you continue to remove the fatheroflions link from the link section.

Again, it is requested of you to please cease continuing to remove the link to the George Adamson information site fatheroflions.org from the link section on the wikipedia George Adamson page. Of the links on this George Adamson page the fatheroflions link is the most relevant and the site offers extensive information about George Adamson. Also please discontinue removing reference links to the fatheroflions.org films and books link and replacing it with a link to the commercial site Amazon. It is our understanding that directly linking to commercial sites is not allowed.

July 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Rice, you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anne Rice. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Monty₈₄₅ 19:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello Lm945. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anne Rice, you may have a conflict of interest, or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

1. Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
2. Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
3. Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
4. Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Rice, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Anne Rice

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lm945 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We are Anne Rice's attorneys. The deleted material contained inaccurate factual information. For security reasons, it was appropriate to delete the area where Ms. Rice lives, and her signature. The material was deleted with Ms. Rice's approval. I have posted this information to MikeWazowski three times. He has repeatedly deleted my explanation and re-instated the deletions to Ms. Rice's page. I have also informed him that Christine Cuddy, of the law firm of Kleinberg Lange Cuddy & Klein LLP has been Ms. Rice's attorney since 1976. A fact which is easily verifiable by Googling the names Anne Rice and Christine Cuddy. Please re-instate our changes, as well as my editing privileges.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=We are Anne Rice's attorneys. The deleted material contained inaccurate factual information. For security reasons, it was appropriate to delete the area where Ms. Rice lives, and her signature. The material was deleted with Ms. Rice's approval. I have posted this information to MikeWazowski three times. He has repeatedly deleted my explanation and re-instated the deletions to Ms. Rice's page. I have also informed him that Christine Cuddy, of the law firm of Kleinberg Lange Cuddy & Klein LLP has been Ms. Rice's attorney since 1976. A fact which is easily verifiable by Googling the names Anne Rice and Christine Cuddy. Please re-instate our changes, as well as my editing privileges. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=We are Anne Rice's attorneys. The deleted material contained inaccurate factual information. For security reasons, it was appropriate to delete the area where Ms. Rice lives, and her signature. The material was deleted with Ms. Rice's approval. I have posted this information to MikeWazowski three times. He has repeatedly deleted my explanation and re-instated the deletions to Ms. Rice's page. I have also informed him that Christine Cuddy, of the law firm of Kleinberg Lange Cuddy & Klein LLP has been Ms. Rice's attorney since 1976. A fact which is easily verifiable by Googling the names Anne Rice and Christine Cuddy. Please re-instate our changes, as well as my editing privileges. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=We are Anne Rice's attorneys. The deleted material contained inaccurate factual information. For security reasons, it was appropriate to delete the area where Ms. Rice lives, and her signature. The material was deleted with Ms. Rice's approval. I have posted this information to MikeWazowski three times. He has repeatedly deleted my explanation and re-instated the deletions to Ms. Rice's page. I have also informed him that Christine Cuddy, of the law firm of Kleinberg Lange Cuddy & Klein LLP has been Ms. Rice's attorney since 1976. A fact which is easily verifiable by Googling the names Anne Rice and Christine Cuddy. Please re-instate our changes, as well as my editing privileges. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}