Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Dewitte: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
nominated for deletion |
m fixed link |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Walter Dewitte]]=== |
===[[Walter Dewitte]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Walter Dewitte}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Dewitte|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 7#{{anchorencode:Walter Dewitte}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|Walter Dewitte}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Dewitte|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 7#{{anchorencode:Walter Dewitte}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Walter Dewitte}}) |
:({{Find sources|Walter Dewitte}}) |
||
This is an unsourced [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and I have been unable to find any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] independent of the subject to add to article even though it is likely accurate based on the results of [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Walter |
This is an unsourced [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and I have been unable to find any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] independent of the subject to add to article even though it is likely accurate based on the results of [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,22&q=%22Walter+Dewitte%22checkpoint this Google Scholar] search. My main concern is [[WP:N|notability]], does his requirement warrent a standone article? I don't think so. <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 20:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:59, 7 July 2011
- Walter Dewitte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an unsourced BLP and I have been unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to add to article even though it is likely accurate based on the results of this Google Scholar search. My main concern is notability, does his requirement warrent a standone article? I don't think so. J04n(talk page) 20:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)