User talk:Spalds

Emeritus GAs

Just to let you know, emeritus general authorities of the LDS Church are still general authorities, so when someone is made an emeritus GA in 2010, it's not appropriate to say in their bio that they ceased being a GA in 2010. They are released from the First Quorum of the Seventy but are never released as a general authority. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Spalds (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Spalds. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chile.
Message added 01:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied again. --Diego Grez (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Gary Herbert

I have no affiliation with Gary Herbert or any of his political opponents as implied by other users. I'm simply a guy who thought it was odd that some major notable and newsworthy controversies were not included within Wikipedia, and then removed after I created them. Holdengreen (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Mike Crapo

Please excuse me as this is the first time I have responded to a message and I am not certain if I have done it correctly. What you pointed out was nothing more than a typographical error, for which I apologize and thank you for pointing out to me. It is now corrected. JDLarsen (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC).

Template:LDSproject

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement#Template:LDSproject. 208.81.184.4 (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on the discussion and add comments if necessary. Regards, Spalds (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed. – Lionel (talk) 05:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Rob Bishop Changes

Thanks for looking over the Rob Bishop page. Your changes are fine, however there were two paragraphs deleted that I have since re-sourced and inserted back into the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snyderut1847 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I made a change to your change which kept the same meaning, but removed some of the more (in my opinion) anti-Bishop sentiments. Also, if you could find a source besides thinkprogress.org (a progressive left-leaning website), it would be great. I kept it in there because the video speaks for itself, but I'd rather have the "review" of the video done by a newspaper or similar entity. Thanks for your help, Spalds (talk) 03:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again. I understand the importance of keeping the neutral point of view so I made some slight tweaks that retain that, however don't overlook any facts.

[[Image:Template:LogoCon|right|80px]] Welcome to WikiProject Conservatism! We are a growing community of editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles related to conservatism. Here's how you can get involved: Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it. Check the Recent changes for vandalism and violations of the neutral point of view policy. Add the project banner {{WikiProject Conservatism}} to conservatism-related articles, and assess them as well. Join fellow members in editing our project-wide article collaboration (the current one is Erdoğanism). Cleanup some of the articles listed for cleanup. Check out the to do list and complete some of the tasks. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! - – Lionel (talk) 07:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)