Jump to content

Talk:Mir EO-19: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
assess
GA bot (talk | contribs)
m Transcluding GA review
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|20:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small>|page=1|subtopic=Physics and astronomy|status=|note=}}
{{GA nominee|20:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small>|page=1|subtopic=Physics and astronomy|status=onreview|note=}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Spaceflight|class=c|importance=Mid|HSF=yes|HSF-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Spaceflight|class=c|importance=Mid|HSF=yes|HSF-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Russia|class=c|importance=low|tech=yes|sci=yes}}
{{WikiProject Russia|class=c|importance=low|tech=yes|sci=yes}}
}}
}}

{{Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1}}

Revision as of 23:47, 7 July 2011

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Thank you for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Prose OK, MoS sufficiently complied with
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir
 Done Added mention/ref to address this concern.
  1. Thanks for sorting this out
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    OK
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    OK
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]