Talk:Preussen-class ironclad/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:10, 11 July 2011

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

shouldn't "German navy" be italicsed?
"much faster" replace with "much more quickly"

Assessment: GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 '''Reviewer:''' [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
+*shouldn't "German navy" be italicsed?
+*"much faster" replace with "much more quickly"
+;Assessment
+:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN|here]] for what they are not)
+#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
+#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
+#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
+#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
+#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#It is '''stable'''.
+#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
+#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
+#::
+#'''Overall''':
+#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}
+#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->