User talk:Thepoliticalmaster

Thepoliticalmaster was the last person to edit my user talk page! This user is inactive for a little while. :-)

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #190

A kitten for you!

Per your request

Monty₈₄₅ 20:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

trout!

"WP:WHACK" redirects here. You may be looking for WP:Wikipedia is not Whac-A-Mole (WP:WHAC).

Not to be confused with Cod throwing.

Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of disruptive edits, which earn warnings and blocks.

Example

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

To whack a user with a wet trout, simply place {{trout}} on their talk page.

mabdul 20:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You are hereby directed to leave User:Anna Frodesiak alone, If you contact her again by any means you will be blocked for harrassment. ZooPro 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC) ZooPro 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit restrictions

I believe you may be exceeding the limits of your unblock [2]. Note that User:Steven Zhang specifies that you may only edit his designated adoption pages and his user talk page unless the adoption tasks require more (he doesn't even include your talk page but that is presumed to be allowed to ensure you can communicate with other editors to avoid disputes. I would also note that, although not a formal restriction, he recommends you archive your talk page rather than simply removing messages. Finally, this edit is refactoring (because it leave the other editors comments standing alone without context) and it also violates the spirit of user talk pages - although anyone (except one under an edit restriction) may edit another editor's talk page, removing material, even that you put there yourself is not really for you to do but for the person whose talk page it is. Your edits on User talk:Anna Frodesiak have appeared to be harassing and at best are unwanted by that user. They are improper in their own right but considering your editing restrictions they are very disconcerting. If you have an content dispute with another editor or feel another editor is being uncivil, I suggest you discuss it with your mentor and either ask him for guidance or ask him to intercede to try to defuse things. Because you are under an adoption that was arranged to lift a block and involves the enforcement through technical means of edit restrictions, I will notify your mentor of this issue as well.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 13:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

IRC chatlogs

I just read your post at User_talk:ZooPro.

I would like your permission to publish the IRC chatlogs. Do you have any objections? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes I do object, primarily because you were not interested in talking to me in the first place, now that I am leaving you alone, you can't resist to annoy me, the reason I was speaking to ZooPro and Doug is so that any contact to be made would be through them. As I also said please do not contact me directly contact my mentor. Also I may consider if you tell me which ones these are. May I have your permission to speak to you on IRC? Also if you had just put me on /ignore then it would have saved this whole row. -- PoliMaster ^talk/_spy 15:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)