User talk:Lightpositive: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Notification of WP:AN/EW report: new section |
Reverting possible vandalism by Dave1185, this is not your talkpage no one cares about your rants and if you continue to vandalise my userpage your the one that will end up blocked in the administrators noticeboard |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
This page should not be speedy deleted because it is about a political party and it exists --[[User:Lightpositive|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 12pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:yellow 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Lightpositive</span>]] [[User talk:Lightpositive|<sup>talk here</sup>]] 10:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
This page should not be speedy deleted because it is about a political party and it exists --[[User:Lightpositive|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 12pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:yellow 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Lightpositive</span>]] [[User talk:Lightpositive|<sup>talk here</sup>]] 10:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:This doesn't make it [[WP:N|notable]]. We never said that it doesn't exit, only that you didn't "credibly indicate the [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|importance or significance]] of the subject". [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 15:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
:This doesn't make it [[WP:N|notable]]. We never said that it doesn't exit, only that you didn't "credibly indicate the [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|importance or significance]] of the subject". [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 15:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
==July 2011== |
|||
===First 3RR warning=== |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:2011 Egyptian revolution]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br> |
|||
In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: |
|||
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 12:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{help-me-helped}} |
|||
Why was i warned for edit warring ? i did '''NOT''' break the 3RR nor was i edit warring, and why does the other person who reverted my edits not warned also ? |
|||
::and also i can meybe understand why i was warned , but why was i warned with a "block" you cannot block me if i dint break 3RR |
|||
Hi Lightpositive. The reason you were warned for edit warring was that you were adding information which could be seen as not neutral, or could possibly have been unsourced - calling something "revolutionary" is a subjective term, and it was removed twice at least, and you promptly added it back again. Replacing information removed by others, more than once, is seen as edit warring. If you disagree with the fact that it was removed, you're advised to take it to the [[Talk:2011 Egyptian revolution|talk page]] and discuss it there. Otherwise as Dave1185 said, don't add it back again, or you risk being blocked. The reason 3RR was mentioned is that it's most often violated during an edit war, there is no insinuation that your broke 3RR, merely that it's something to note in the situation. '''[[User:BarkingFish|<font color="red" size="2" face="Tahoma">Fish</font>]][[User_talk:BarkingFish|<font color="blue" size="2" face="Tahoma"><sup>Barking?</sup></font>]]''' 23:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::So you mean that your edit warring warning is not subjective ? and then especially saying my edits was subjective and unsourced while accusing me of edit warring and then blocking people with the argument "you did not break any official rule but i simply dont agree with you" and you still didnt answer my question, why did the '''other people didn't get a warning''' but i did ? doesn't their edit warring count as well ?[[User:Lightpositive|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 12pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:yellow 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Lightpositive</span>]] [[User talk:Lightpositive|<sup>talk</sup>]] 00:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Hi, Lightpositive. The reason why no one else was warned is because multiple users reverted your addition, not just one person. So the only one in danger of breaking the 3RR rule was you—not the people reverting you. When you see your aditions being reverted in this way, it is a really good idea to go to the talk page and discuss the differences in opinion there. 3RR is not an entitlement, and people can be blocked for edit warring even if they have not technically broken the 3RR rule, so if someone starts reverting you on contentious articles like this one, it is best to go to the talk page right away. Please see [[WP:3RR]] for details on the edit warring rules. Regards, --[[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 01:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}} |
|||
*Read up also on [[WP:UNSOURCED]], which states that: '''"The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material."''', meaning you, dear sir, has to bear the responsibility of finding a reputable/reliable newspaper (per [[WP:Identifying reliable sources]]) as a printed source (per [[WP:Verifiability]]) that actually supports your insertion that the Egyptian Army is indeed "revolutionary". As for edit-warring, I'm sure you had an earful by now from the other editors (including from an Admin!) so I'll drop the needless. Hope this clear things up for you. Another question if I may ask you, is this your first account here on Wikipedia? --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 11:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===Second 3RR warning=== |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Ayman al-Zawahiri]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br> |
|||
In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: |
|||
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''''Note: This is your second warning of potential 3RR.''''' <small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 15:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===You have been reported!=== |
|||
*Hi! For edit warring within the last two days despite the earlier warning to you, I have reported you on [[WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lightpositive reported by User:Dave1185 (Result: )]]. Best. --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 16:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Notification of [[WP:AN/EW]] report == |
|||
[[File:Ambox content.png|left|link=]] Hello '''Lightpositive''',<br /> |
|||
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for '''''Violation of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Edit warring]] policy''''' at the [[WP:AN/EW#User:Lightpositive_reported_by_User:Dave1185_.28Result:_.29|Administrators' noticeboard]].<br /> |
|||
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the [[WP:AN/EW#User:Lightpositive_reported_by_User:Dave1185_.28Result:_.29|noticeboard]]. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. |
|||
~ [[User:NekoBot|NekoBot]] <small>([[User_Talk:NekoBot|MeowTalk]])</small> 16:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC) <small>(False positive? [[User:NekoBot#False_Positive|Report it!]])</small> <!-- Template: User:NekoBot/3RRAttn --> |
Revision as of 18:40, 16 July 2011
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello, i cannot find where i can contribute i can of course click the random article button but that gives(for the most part) unknown(for me that is) articles which i have no experience of , can i get a list or information about how i could help wikipedia ?
- One way to get started would be to look at the Wikipedia:Community portal, and scroll down one page to the big section titled "Help out". I'll leave the "helpme" active so that other helpers can add other suggestions. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- With your multi-language skills , might check out Wikipedia:Translation. I don't have those skills, but I understand they are often looking for help.
- Given how new you are, I would urge you to contact one of the editors on this list to find how how one should proceed.--SPhilbrickT 16:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- The backlog has many projects on it. onyx321 09:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- For the moment I changed the helpme-template. Feel free to change it back. Another idea to get to articles in your interests, use WP:Categories. mabdul 10:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well maybe someone did not understand what i meant, i just want to clarify that i do have a lot of experience in a lot of subjects that am interested in but meybe not so much about some french village or a rare album of some sort of musicians in the 40's that is not famous Lightpositive talk 13:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Although i didnt say the articles about french village and 40' decade musicians are not important or good, they are very important and very good Lightpositive talk 15:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
True Russian National Unity - The Russian Revolutionary Army - Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because it is about a political party and it exists --Lightpositive talk here 10:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't make it notable. We never said that it doesn't exit, only that you didn't "credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)