Talk:Cristina Odone: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Philip Cross (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<br clear="all"> |
<br clear="all"> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== Her Wikipedia article in the news == |
== Her Wikipedia article in the news == |
||
Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
:: Not significant enough for inclusion yet. When the person behind 'David r' is more decisively exposed, or admits to their behaviour, this might change. As it is, the inference that the individual responsible is [[Johann Hari]] gains a passing mention in that article in relation to his ''Indie'' suspension. [[User:Philip Cross|Philip Cross]] ([[User talk:Philip Cross|talk]]) 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC) |
:: Not significant enough for inclusion yet. When the person behind 'David r' is more decisively exposed, or admits to their behaviour, this might change. As it is, the inference that the individual responsible is [[Johann Hari]] gains a passing mention in that article in relation to his ''Indie'' suspension. [[User:Philip Cross|Philip Cross]] ([[User talk:Philip Cross|talk]]) 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
:The last entry on the third archive page is from August 2009. Comments on talk pages are normally archived after a month or ninety days at most. I have taken the liberty of moving your comments; it is also usual to start sections on talk pages in chronological order. [[User:Philip Cross|Philip Cross]] ([[User talk:Philip Cross|talk]]) 18:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:03, 22 July 2011
Biography B‑class | |||||||
|
University of Oxford B‑class | |||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Cristina Odone:
Priority 7
|
Journalism Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Her Wikipedia article in the news
Enough reliable sources are covering Cristina Odone and her Wikipedia article that I think it's worthy of inclusion in the article itself. Not being a long-time editor of this article, I'm asking for other opinions. Here are just a few of the more mainstream mentions of the controversy:
- "When he fell out with Hari, Cohen found that a certain “David r” had tinkered nastily with his Wikipedia entry; the same happened to Cristina Odone when she questioned the reliability of young Johann’s journalism." —The Telegraph
- "Observer columist Nick Cohen and former New Statesman deputy editor Cristina Odone are among those who found their Wikipedia entries trashed by a user named "David r from Meth Productions" after disagreements with Hari, while Hari's own page remained spotless." —Huffington Post
- "Odone, who had criticized Hari's work at the New Statesmen, also found that her Wikipedia page contained allegations that she was 'homophobe' and an 'anti-Semite' and "such a disastrous journalist that the Catholic Herald had fired her," Cohen reported. He continued: "Her husband, Edward Lucas, went online to defend her reputation, but 'David r from Meth Productions' tried to stop him. Mr 'r' gave the same treatment to Francis Wheen, Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson after they had spats with Hari. It didn't stop there. Lucas noticed that anonymous editors had inserted Hari's views on a wide range of people and issues into the relevant Wikipedia pages, while Hari himself had a glowing Wikipedia profile -- until the scandal broke, that is -- much of it written by 'David r'." —Huffington Post
- "The latest allegations to surface in the past week relate to claims that Hari used a pseudonym to make unflattering edits to the Wikipedia entries for journalists including Nick Cohen, the Observer and Spectator columnist, and Daily Telegraph writer and novelist Cristina Odone." —The Guardian
First Light (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not significant enough for inclusion yet. When the person behind 'David r' is more decisively exposed, or admits to their behaviour, this might change. As it is, the inference that the individual responsible is Johann Hari gains a passing mention in that article in relation to his Indie suspension. Philip Cross (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Archiving policy
I just noticed that the meat of the discussions are now really only available via the links Archive 1 and Archive 2 etc. this was NOT so just a week or so ago. I know archiving methodologies and this does not fit that. Maybe the contents of the archive deserve a wiki post in its own light ? Skthetwo (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- The last entry on the third archive page is from August 2009. Comments on talk pages are normally archived after a month or ninety days at most. I have taken the liberty of moving your comments; it is also usual to start sections on talk pages in chronological order. Philip Cross (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class University of Oxford articles
- Unknown-importance University of Oxford articles
- B-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- Automatically assessed University of Oxford articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Unassessed Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press