Jump to content

User talk:OAnimosity: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RE:: new section
Line 35: Line 35:


Hi, first off, stop acting as if you had any real power on here. Second, I never vandalized anything, I added cited information that was removed from an article. In a sense, I reverted vandalism. I am sorry that you are too busy sucking up to the admins trying to get rollback to read the damn site policy. [[User:The.remoney.09|The.remoney.09]] ([[User talk:The.remoney.09|talk]]) 09:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, first off, stop acting as if you had any real power on here. Second, I never vandalized anything, I added cited information that was removed from an article. In a sense, I reverted vandalism. I am sorry that you are too busy sucking up to the admins trying to get rollback to read the damn site policy. [[User:The.remoney.09|The.remoney.09]] ([[User talk:The.remoney.09|talk]]) 09:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
:OH BOOHOO. GO AHEAD AND KEEP POSTING WARNING TEMPLATES ON MY TALK PAGE. [[User:The.remoney.09|The.remoney.09]] ([[User talk:The.remoney.09|talk]]) 09:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:31, 23 July 2011


Caylee's Law

there is a stub here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caylee%27s_Law. I'm going back to medieval article but I am sure that you and others could do a good job on it. Nice working with you. Mugginsx (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Lorean Records

Hello Grim Littlez. I am just letting you know that I deleted Lorean Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Millice.BigJim707 (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Justin Bieber

Hello. Regarding your message on my talk page [1], perhaps you have me mistaken for someone else? The last CSD on the Justin Bieber article was in June 2009, and that was requested by I dream of horses (talk · contribs), not me. Likewise I cannot find any record of me having ever edited the article on Bieber, or anything else relating to Bieber. Regards, — Kralizec! (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Pelium

Hey, you helped me out a little while ago with Battle of Uxian Defile and I was hoping that you could help me out again with a new article I've been working on. I'm having the same problem with the article I just created called Siege of Pelium, I created the source thing and I believe I did it right, yet it's still giving me that shit in the bottom.SteveMooreSmith3 (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thats what I did, but it does't seem to be working. I recently bought the book and was citing it directly from there. But it wasn't working so I just went online and found it there. There's still that lil bleh red thing on the bottom.SteveMooreSmith3 (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, OAnimosity. You have new messages at Yankees10's talk page.
Message added 06:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, OAnimosity. You have new messages at Eagles247's talk page.
Message added 06:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSD Help

Hi. I noticed you were looking for some CSD guidance on User:TerriersFan's userpage. There is a great essay on CSD at WP:WIHSD that I think covers it exactly. It should help you understand CSD better and why we use PROD and AfD. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is built on consensus. Every decision must be based in consensus. When you tag an article for CSD, you arn't making a decision by yourself. You are making a decision based on what the community has agreed as consensus to delete. So even when 1 person tags an article for CSD, it's actually a community decision. The community consensus has limited CSD to only the most obvious and unambiguous of articles for deletion. If there is any doubt whatsoever, then it is probably meant for another process. Read WP:WIHSD and let me know what you think.--v/r - TP 22:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Hi, first off, stop acting as if you had any real power on here. Second, I never vandalized anything, I added cited information that was removed from an article. In a sense, I reverted vandalism. I am sorry that you are too busy sucking up to the admins trying to get rollback to read the damn site policy. The.remoney.09 (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OH BOOHOO. GO AHEAD AND KEEP POSTING WARNING TEMPLATES ON MY TALK PAGE. The.remoney.09 (talk) 09:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]