Talk:Language proficiency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:25, 27 July 2011

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Still working on this. Hoping to be done by 3.30 UTC.samwaltz 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In civil aviation

Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (Language Proficiency Endorsement) that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Still working on this. Hoping to be done by 3.30 UTC.[[User:Samwaltz|samwaltz]] 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
-== Language profiency for pilots ==
+== In civil aviation ==
-Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (''Language profiency endorsement'') that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. [[User:Jan olieslagers|Jan olieslagers]] ([[User talk:Jan olieslagers|talk]]) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
+Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (''Language Proficiency Endorsement'') that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. [[User:Jan olieslagers|Jan olieslagers]] ([[User talk:Jan olieslagers|talk]]) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)