Talk:Counterproductive work behavior: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Dangby - "→problem with this article: " |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==CFBs can be productive?== |
==CFBs can be productive?== |
||
http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0018349 |
http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0018349 |
||
This referenced study for whether CFBs can be productive only looked at two types of CFBs, but the article asserted that CFBs may be productive, according to the referenced study. I changed the article by adding the word 'some' so that some CFBs may be productive, but the article should be improved further by mentioning which CFBs were studied, and what the outcome of the study was. |
This referenced study for whether CFBs can be productive only looked at two types of CFBs, but the article asserted that CFBs may be productive, according to the referenced study. I changed the article by adding the word 'some' so that some CFBs may be productive, but the article should be improved further by mentioning which CFBs were studied, and what the outcome of the study was. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dangby|Dangby]] ([[User talk:Dangby|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dangby|contribs]]) 18:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 18:17, 28 July 2011
Psychology C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Far too simplistic
Probably most CWB is caused by incivility and bullying and the employer/managers are probably responsible for most of it, unintentionally or otherwise, because of their underlying psychopathology.--Penbat (talk) 10:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
problem with this article
"It has been found that lower performance, lack of reward contingencies for performance, and better external job opportunities."
what has been found ?
"Accidents are a serious and costly form of counterproductive behavior."
accident isn't a behavior !!!
69.171.158.232 (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes it is a poorly developed article although the subject itself is very interesting. I am doing more work on this article so it should improve. --Penbat (talk) 09:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
CFBs can be productive?
http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0018349 This referenced study for whether CFBs can be productive only looked at two types of CFBs, but the article asserted that CFBs may be productive, according to the referenced study. I changed the article by adding the word 'some' so that some CFBs may be productive, but the article should be improved further by mentioning which CFBs were studied, and what the outcome of the study was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dangby (talk • contribs) 18:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)