Talk:History of Lorentz transformations: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:33, 31 July 2011

History of Science B‑class Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics: History B‑class Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

Prehistory

The article says nothing about the symmetry of Lorentz transformations as it was known by English mathematicians. Relativity was rather quickly adopted due to familiarity with biquaternions and writings of William Kingdon Clifford and Alexander Macfarlane. Fundamental work by Gilbert N. Lewis and Edwin Bidwell Wilson set the Lorentz transformation into the context of synthetic geometry. Furthermore, Whittaker spelled out for everyone just how the Lorentz transformation works to express the Principle of Relativity. This article, like History of Special Relativity, neglects the developments in abstract algebra and transformation geometry that made possible relativity science. While I appreciate that numerous references and given and the viewpoint is orthodox, the article does not stand up the standards of due diligence in academic research.Rgdboer (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then you should append a new section about this. --D.H (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The basic idea behind the Lorentz transformation can be understood as Corner Flow from hydrodynamics. When you go to the essence of the matter, the planar mapping of a Lorentz boost is an old idea, older than the linear algebra which frames the subject today.Rgdboer (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Corrected link to Corner Flow.Rgdboer (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :Well, then you should append a new section about this. --[[User:D.H|D.H]] ([[User talk:D.H|talk]]) 08:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
-The basic idea behind the Lorentz transformation can be understood as [http://imechanica.org/node/10518 Corner Flow] from hydrodynamics. When you go to the essence of the matter, the planar mapping of a Lorentz boost is an old idea, older than the linear algebra which frames the subject today.[[User:Rgdboer|Rgdboer]] ([[User talk:Rgdboer|talk]]) 20:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
+The basic idea behind the Lorentz transformation can be understood as [http://imechanica.org/node/10543 Corner Flow] from hydrodynamics. When you go to the essence of the matter, the planar mapping of a Lorentz boost is an old idea, older than the linear algebra which frames the subject today.[[User:Rgdboer|Rgdboer]] ([[User talk:Rgdboer|talk]]) 20:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
+Corrected link to Corner Flow.[[User:Rgdboer|Rgdboer]] ([[User talk:Rgdboer|talk]]) 21:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)