Jump to content

Sledgehammer (alleged coup plan): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Qwerspam (talk | contribs)
125 edits
Qwerspam (talk | contribs)
125 edits
Line 22: Line 22:


==Comments on the trial==
==Comments on the trial==
When on 5 April 2011 the Court rejected the demands for release for the second time the General Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces issued a press release.<ref name=tsk>[http://www.tsk.tr/10_ARSIV/10_1_Basin_Yayin_Faaliyetleri/10_1_Basin_Aciklamalari/2011/BA_05.htm Press Release BA 05/11], published on the website of the Turkish Armed Force on 06.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Reminding that the [[Turkish Armed Forces]] repeatedly informed on the seminars in question and the expert opinion the prosecutor's office had demanded it was hard to understand why the court had ordered the continuation of pre-trial detention.<ref name= tsk/> Mehmet Ali Şahin, President of the [[Grand National Assembly of Turkey]], stated that the press release casts a doubt in the judiciary in Turkey.<ref name=CNN>[http://www.cnnturk.com/2011/turkiye/04/07/sahinden.tsknin.balyoz.aciklamasina.elestiri/612477.0/index.html Şahin'den TSK'nın 'Balyoz' açıklamasına eleştiri] CNN Türk of 07.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Deputy President of the [[Justice and Development Party (Turkey)|AKP]], Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference in an ongoing trial.<ref name=CNN/>
When on 5 April 2011 the Court rejected the demands for release for the second time, the General Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces issued a press release.<ref name=tsk>[http://www.tsk.tr/10_ARSIV/10_1_Basin_Yayin_Faaliyetleri/10_1_Basin_Aciklamalari/2011/BA_05.htm Press Release BA 05/11], published on the website of the Turkish Armed Force on 06.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Reminding that the [[Turkish Armed Forces]] repeatedly informed on the seminars in question and the expert opinion the prosecutor's office had demanded it was hard to understand why the court had ordered the continuation of pre-trial detention.<ref name= tsk/> Mehmet Ali Şahin, President of the [[Grand National Assembly of Turkey]], stated that the press release casts a doubt in the judiciary in Turkey.<ref name=CNN>[http://www.cnnturk.com/2011/turkiye/04/07/sahinden.tsknin.balyoz.aciklamasina.elestiri/612477.0/index.html Şahin'den TSK'nın 'Balyoz' açıklamasına eleştiri] CNN Türk of 07.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Deputy President of the [[Justice and Development Party (Turkey)|AKP]], Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference in an ongoing trial.<ref name=CNN/>
US Ambassador to [[Ankara]] [[Francis J. Ricciardone, Jr.|Francis J. Ricciardone]] stated that a transparent trial was expected and he tried to understand, how freedom of press could be discussed, when journalists were being arrested.<ref>[http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkish-press-scan-for-feb.-16-2011-02-16 Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 16] in Hürriyet Daily News of 16.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference into internal affairs.<ref>[http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkish-press-scan-for-feb.-17-2011-02-17 Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 17] in Hürriyet Daily News of 17.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref>
US Ambassador to [[Ankara]] [[Francis J. Ricciardone, Jr.|Francis J. Ricciardone]] stated that a transparent trial was expected and he tried to understand, how freedom of press could be discussed, when journalists were being arrested.<ref>[http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkish-press-scan-for-feb.-16-2011-02-16 Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 16] in Hürriyet Daily News of 16.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref> Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference into internal affairs.<ref>[http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkish-press-scan-for-feb.-17-2011-02-17 Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 17] in Hürriyet Daily News of 17.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011</ref>


Revision as of 16:45, 1 August 2011

Sledgehammer (Turkish Balyoz) is the name of an alleged Turkish secularist military coup plan which reportedly dates back to 2003.[1]

Reports of the alleged plot first surfaced in the liberal Taraf newspaper, which said it had discovered documents detailing plans to bomb two Istanbul mosques and provoke Greece into shooting down a Turkish plane over the Aegean Sea.[2][3] The plan allegedly was to stir up chaos and justify a military coup.

The army said the plans had been discussed but only as part of a planning exercise at a military seminar.[4][5]

Arrests

On 21 February 2010 operations were carried out in nine provinces.[6] 49 people were detained including admirals, generals and colonels, some of them retired.[6] On 23 February six of them were released, but seven were arrested. Another five suspects were arrested on 24 February.[6] Further detentions and arrests followed, but at the beginning of April 2010 the number of people in pre-trial detention had dropped to nine, while 35 arrested suspects had been released, including prime suspect retired general Çetin Doğan, who had been the commander of the First Army.[7] On 31 March and 1 April, 28 suspects in the investigation were released. A judge released 19 of the suspects due to the “existence of serious doubt regarding the crime”. 9 others were released due to their “social standing.”[3]

On 5 April 2010 an additional 95 people (including 86 military personnel, 70 of them on active duty), were detained in 14 provinces on the same day. 9 suspects released earlier were rearrested on 6 April. However, Istanbul's chief prosecutor, Aykut Cengiz Engin ordered the removal of prosecutors Mehmet Berk and Bilal Bayraktar from the probe as his order "any detention decision should not be taken without my approval" was not abided by.[8] On 6 April Engin also replaced coordinating prosecutor of the investigation Süleyman Pehlivan with Mehmet Ergül.[9]

In May and June 2011 another round of interrogations followed resulting in the arrest of 15 members of the Turkish Armed Forces.[10] The arrests are based on documents reportedly seized in February from a house that belonged to Col. Hakan Buyuk. The new evidence consists of written documents, video files and digital material on a flash disk, and includes plans to be put into action if the alleged coup attempt were to fail.[10]

Trial

The trial started on 16 December 2010 with the first court hearing, held in the court house of Silivri Prison. The presiding judge, Ömer Diken, was appointed only two days earlier, after the previous presiding judge was removed because of an ongoing disciplinary investigation.[11] 187 defendants were present.[12] Nine defendants including retired General Ergin Saygun had not appeared.[12] None of the defendants was in pre-trial detention.[12]

After the hearing of 11 February 2011 the court decided to arrest 163 defendants.[13] Meanwhile the court room in Silivri Prison was extended.[14]

On 20 February 2011 an additional indictment was forwarded to Istanbul Heavy Penal Court 10. It charged 28 defendants, 15 of them in pre-trial detention in connection with documents found at the home of Colonel Hakan Büyük with "the attempt to remove the government of the Turkish Republic" and demanded sentences between 15 and 20 years' imprisonment. In case that the indictment is accepted the case may be merged with the main Sledgehammer (Balyoz) case in which 196 defendants are on trial.[15]

On 29 July 2011 the court charged 22 suspects. On the same day the chief of the Turkish armed forces, Isik Kosaner, has resigned along with the army, navy and air force heads. Kosaner portrayed his resignation as a protest at the jailing of military officers. "It has become impossible for me to continue in this high office, because I am unable to fulfil my responsibility to protect the rights of my personnel as the chief of general staff," Kosaner said.[16]Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan accepted the resignations and appointed Necdet Ozel as the chief of the armed forces. The decision stamped the civilian authority on the country’s military, which has long regarded itself as a protector of Turkey’s secular traditions.“This is effectively the end of the military’s role in Turkish democracy,” said Asli Aydintasbas, a columnist for the Turkish daily newspaper Milliyet. “This is the symbolic moment where the first Turkish republic ends and the second republic begins.”[17]

Comments on the trial

When on 5 April 2011 the Court rejected the demands for release for the second time, the General Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces issued a press release.[18] Reminding that the Turkish Armed Forces repeatedly informed on the seminars in question and the expert opinion the prosecutor's office had demanded it was hard to understand why the court had ordered the continuation of pre-trial detention.[18] Mehmet Ali Şahin, President of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, stated that the press release casts a doubt in the judiciary in Turkey.[19] Deputy President of the AKP, Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference in an ongoing trial.[19] US Ambassador to Ankara Francis J. Ricciardone stated that a transparent trial was expected and he tried to understand, how freedom of press could be discussed, when journalists were being arrested.[20] Hüseyin Çelik called this an interference into internal affairs.[21]

Relatives of chief suspect Çetin Doğan went further in their criticism. Dani Rodrik and Pinar Dogan[22] stated, "What lies behind the trials is an apparent effort to discredit the government’s opponents on the basis of the flimsiest evidence and often, far worse, by framing them with planted evidence and forged documents."[23] Commenting on all investigations in the Ergenekon cases the son-in-law and daughter of General Çetin Doğan alleged

  • The key evidence is typically produced by anonymous informants
  • They provide the “originals” of secret documents detailing criminal activities
  • These revelations are followed by selective leaks to the media about the “evidence”[23]

Against this Fevzi Bilgin, Assistant Professor of Political Science, St. Mary's College of Maryland held, "Mr. Rodnik’s interpretation and presentation of the case is neither unbiased nor genuinely informational. It is also a platform to internationalize the grievances of the current military establishment in Turkey and defame the current government as being religiously motivated.[24] In his opinion "It is rather likely that Sledgehammer was the first coup plan devised right after AKP’s victory in the parliamentary elections on November 3, 2002."[24]

See also

References

  1. ^ Balyoz Operation II: Squash Blossoms Article of Prof. Dr. Ihsan Bal, Director of USAK's Center for Security Studies, published on 31 March 2010; accessed on 12 April 2011
  2. ^ adı Balyoz in the daily Taraf of 20 January 2001 (original news in Turkish); accessed on 12 April 2011
  3. ^ a b Sledgehammer releases shakes belief in impartial judiciary Sunday's Zaman of 4 April 2010
  4. ^ Şimdi de Balyoz Melih Aşık in Milliyet of 22 January 2010; accessed on 13 April 2011
  5. ^ Turkey: Military chiefs resign en masse
  6. ^ a b c 'Hükümeti devirecek miydiniz?' Article in Radikal of 25 February 2010; accessed on 12 April 2011
  7. ^ Çetin Doğan tahliye edildi Archives of Hürriyet of 1 April 2010; accessed on 12 April 2011
  8. ^ Turkish Press Scan April 6th
  9. ^ Sledgehammer leads to new judicial crisis in Turkey
  10. ^ a b Two more officers arrested in Turkey's 'Sledgehammer' probe NewsAz of 7 June 2011; accessed on 14 June 2011
  11. ^ Selcan Hacaoğlu (December 16, 2010). "New Turkish coup trial begins". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 16, 2010.
  12. ^ a b c Balyoz davası gergin başladı in Hürriyet of 16.10.2010; accessed on 12.04.2011
  13. ^ Balyoz'da 163 tutuklama, News Agency Dogan of 11.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  14. ^ Balyoz’un duruşma salonu genişletildi Milliyet of 11.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  15. ^ Bilvanis paşasına 20 yıl istendi daily Yeni Şafak of 21 June 2011, accessed on 21 June 2011
  16. ^ Turkey: Military chiefs resign en masse
  17. ^ Top Generals Quit in Group, Stunning Turks
  18. ^ a b Press Release BA 05/11, published on the website of the Turkish Armed Force on 06.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  19. ^ a b Şahin'den TSK'nın 'Balyoz' açıklamasına eleştiri CNN Türk of 07.04.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  20. ^ Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 16 in Hürriyet Daily News of 16.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  21. ^ Turkish Press Scan for Feb. 17 in Hürriyet Daily News of 17.02.2011; accessed on 12.04.2011
  22. ^ Pinar Dogan is a lecturer in public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. Dani Rodrik is a professor of international political economy at the Harvard Kennedy School.
  23. ^ a b Of the three sources mentioned in a separate article only the one from The New Republic, entitled "Turkey’s Other Dirty War" is available without subscription, dated 24 May 2010; accessed on 19 May 2011
  24. ^ a b Sledgehammer (Balyoz): How Turkey Averted a Coup in 2003 Washington Review of July 2010; accessed on 19 May 2011
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Sledgehammer_(alleged_coup_plan)&oldid=442533239"